| New Reply |
Game Theory ( 2 player zero-sum game) |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb26-12, 10:43 AM | #1 |
|
|
Game Theory ( 2 player zero-sum game)
Hi
I have just started a game theory module and have been given the following exercise. Can anyone help me with the following question. I have a feeling I can use a minimax argument to answer this but I am not sure how to go about this. Suppose a two-player zero-sum game has the following matrix: A = a b c d Suppose that (e1; e1) is an equilibrium solution. Suppose K a member of the ℝ is a constant. Show for the new game matrix: A0 = a + K b + K c + K d + K that (e1; e1) is still the equilibrium solution. |
| Feb26-12, 11:08 AM | #2 |
|
|
if i let Suppose a two-player zero-sum game has the following matrix:
A1 = a b c d then calculate e2TA1e1 = c Then if I let A2 = a+k b+k c+k d+k then e2TA2e1 = c+k but I have no idea if this is right or what to do next |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Game Theory ( 2 player zero-sum game)
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Trading Card Game Player needs Probability help please | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 17 | ||
| Help with game theory (specific knowledge in game theory probably not required) | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| Game theory: which two-player games solved analytically | General Math | 2 | ||
| Game Theory - Heuristic for single-player puzzle | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 0 | ||
| 2 player nim game | General Math | 3 | ||