Simple surface integration blues {again}

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter brendan_foo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Surface
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating surface integrals, specifically focusing on the integral of a function over a portion of a plane defined by the equation x + y + z = 1 in the first octant. Participants explore the application of surface integral formulas, the correct limits of integration, and the use of polar coordinates for different surface shapes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for surface integrals based on plane projection methods but later corrects it to include differential area elements.
  • Another participant points out that the limits of integration for the surface integral were calculated incorrectly and provides a corrected integral setup.
  • A participant expresses a need for clarification on the theory of iterated integrals, indicating a struggle with the mathematical language in their textbook.
  • Discussion shifts to a new surface integral problem involving a paraboloid, with suggestions to use polar coordinates for integration.
  • One participant mentions the complexity of a specific integral and its connection to elliptic integrals, noting that it cannot be expressed in elementary functions.
  • Another participant shares their difficulties in evaluating the integral, indicating frustration with arriving at the same expression without a solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to correctly set up the limits of integration for surface integrals, but there remains uncertainty regarding the evaluation of specific integrals and the application of polar coordinates. The discussion includes multiple competing views on how to approach the problems presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the geometric interpretation of the surfaces involved, as well as the complexity of the integrals that may not yield elementary solutions.

brendan_foo
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm still reading on about surface integrals and stuff, and I've arrived at a formula that goes like this {based on plane projection methods} :

[tex]\iint_S G(x,y,z) dS = \iint_R G(x,y,z) \sqrt{1 + \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}}[/tex]

So this is the question at hand :

Evaluate the surface integral : [itex]\iint_S G(x,y,z) dS[/itex]

where S is the portion of the plane [itex]x + y + z = 1[/itex] in the first octant, and [itex]G(x,y,z) = z[/itex]

So, finding the partial derivatives etc.. i arrive at :

[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 \int_0^1 z dx dy[/tex] which is equivalent to : [tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 \int_0^1 (1 - x - y) dx dy[/tex]...I chose the limits for dx and dy as so...

x + y + z = 1... in the x plane... y+z = 0 thus x = 1, y = 0, and the same reasoning for y...

Computing this i get :

[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 (1 - \frac{1}{2} - y) dy = \sqrt{3}\left[ y - \frac{y}{2} - \frac{y^2}{2} \right]_{0}^{1} = 0[/tex] if I am not mistaken..

The official solution however is [tex]\frac{\sqrt{3}}{6}[/tex]

Help :( :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brendan_foo said:
Hi there,

I'm still reading on about surface integrals and stuff, and I've arrived at a formula that goes like this {based on plane projection methods} :

[tex]\iint_S G(x,y,z) dS = \iint_R G(x,y,z) \sqrt{1 + \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}}[/tex]

Well, actually, that should be
[tex]\iint_S G(x,y,z) dS = \iint_R G(x,y,z) \sqrt{1 + \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}}dx dy[/tex]


So this is the question at hand :

Evaluate the surface integral : [itex]\iint_S G(x,y,z) dS[/itex]

where S is the portion of the plane [itex]x + y + z = 1[/itex] in the first octant, and [itex]G(x,y,z) = z[/itex]

So, finding the partial derivatives etc.. i arrive at :

[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 \int_0^1 z dx dy[/tex] which is equivalent to : [tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 \int_0^1 (1 - x - y) dx dy[/tex]...I chose the limits for dx and dy as so...

x + y + z = 1... in the x plane... y+z = 0 thus x = 1, y = 0, and the same reasoning for y...

Computing this i get :

[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_0^1 (1 - \frac{1}{2} - y) dy = \sqrt{3}\left[ y - \frac{y}{2} - \frac{y^2}{2} \right]_{0}^{1} = 0[/tex] if I am not mistaken..

The official solution however is [tex]\frac{\sqrt{3}}{6}[/tex]

Help :( :(

Here's how I like to do problems like this: the surface is given by x+ y+ z= 1 and we can think of that as a "level surface" of f(x,y,z)= x+ y+ z. The gradient of f: i+ j+ k is normal to that and its length is the differential of area. I like to think of it as the "vector differential of area" . In this particular case, the differential of area, projected onto the xy-plane, is
[itex]\sqrt{3}dxdy[/itex], just as you have.


HOWEVER, you have calculated the limits of integration wrong. The plane x+ y+ z= 1, in the first quadrant, is a triangle with vertices at (1,0,0), (0,1,0), and (0,0,1). Projecting down to the xy-plane, we get a triangle with vertices at (0,0), (1,0), and (0,1). Of course, the sides of that triangle are the x-axis, the y-axis, and the line x+ y= 1.

If we choose to order the integrals with the x-integral outside, then x ranges from 0 to 1, just as you say. BUT, FOR EACH X, y ranges from 0 up to y= 1-x, the slant line. Your integral should be
[tex]\sqrt{3}\int_{x=0}^{1}\int_{y= 0}^{1-x}(1-x-y)dydx[/tex]

Integrate that and see what you get.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Saviour...I suppose I should polish up on the theory of iterated integrals...The book I currently have contains a lot of mathematical language, such of that a mere engineering student finds a bit much on first glance.. Could someone just brief me up on the theory of these iterated integrals in which a limit is a function.. I know its analogous to partial derivatives, but that's as far as i go :D

Cheers guys, another triumph! :D:D


Edit : Just to get the ball rolling, the next question is of the same form; but :

[tex]G(x,y,z) = \frac{1}{1 + 4(x^2 + y^2)}[/tex] and [tex]z = x^2 + y^2[/tex]
from Z = 0 to Z = 1; If someone could just push me in the right direction, regarding limits and whether or not i should convert to polar coordinates.

Thanks again :biggrin: :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Yes,the surface [itex]z=x^{2}+y^{2} [/tex] is the of a rotation paraboloid round the Oz axis,with the lowest point:the origin of the cartesian coordinate system.It's projection on the Oxy plane is a disk of radius 1.<br /> Use polar coordinates in the Oxy plane.The limits of integration will be:<br /> [tex]0\leq \rho\leq 1;0\leq \phi\leq 2\pi[/tex]<br /> The integrals won't look very pretty,though...<br /> <br /> Daniel.[/itex]
 
I wish there was a real time chat facility :biggrin:
 
:( this integral is pretty tricky, any takers?! I've got the numerical solution but my answers just won't agree...sigh :frown:
 
It's this "baby":
[tex]\int_{0}^{1} d\rho\int_{0}^{+\pi} d\phi \frac{\sqrt{1+2\rho(\sin\phi+\cos\phi)}}{1+4\rho^{2}}[/tex]
,which i guess it cannot be expressed through elementary functions.At least the integral of the angle seems to be put in connection with a complete elliptic integral of the second kind of Legendre.

Daniel.
 
Man that's mighty unfair...I arrived at the same integral as you've stated but evaluating it was somewhat nasty and led no where really.. Ah well, onto the next I suppose.. Thanks to everyone though, the aid is much appreciated.

All the best!
:biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K