Time to decelerate over a given distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter asp55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the time it takes for an object to decelerate from an initial velocity of 95 m/s to a stop over a distance of 8 km. The subject area pertains to kinematics and motion under constant acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply kinematic equations but encounters a negative time result, prompting questions about the correctness of their approach. Some participants suggest revising the formula used and emphasize the need for a second equation to solve for both acceleration and time. Another participant shares a different formula to find acceleration and subsequently calculates time.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to approach the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct application of kinematic equations, and alternative approaches are being considered. There is no explicit consensus yet on the best method to solve the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the deceleration is constant, and there is a need to clarify the relationship between distance, initial velocity, acceleration, and time. The original poster's confusion regarding negative time indicates a potential misunderstanding of the equations involved.

asp55
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alright, so the problem I'm working on is basically as such:

An object with an initial Velocity of 95m/s slides horizontally, constantly losing velocity. After traveling 8 km it comes to a stop.

How long did the object take to travel 8 km.

So here's how I went at it:

δx = v0 + .5at^2

δx+v0 = .5(δv/t)t^2

2(δx+v0) = v(t^2)/t

2(δx+v0)/δv = (t^2)/t

2(δx+v0)/δv = t

Then I plugged in:
δx = 8000m
v0 = 95m/s
δv = -95m/s

Which returned t = -170.421s (Which I thought was odd to begin with, as how can one have a negative value for time.)

But I tried plugging that into my initial equation to see that it all worked out but instead of getting δx = 8000m I got δx = 8190m

So obviously there is a flaw in my logic SOMEWHERE. I just don't know where.

Help please!?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You appear to be using a 'special character' that shows up on my reader as ? .
Was it δ ?

Your first error is not "logic" but the wrong formula: δ x= v0t+ (1/2)at2. You forgot the "t" multiplying v0.
Making that change, assuming that "constantly losing velocity" mean that the decelleration is constant, δx= v0t+ (1/2)at2. You are given that x= 8000 m and that v0= 95 m/s. That leaves a and t as unknowns. Since there are two unknowns, you need a second equation: in that same time, t, the velocity reduces from 95 to 0 so -95= at is the second equation.

You need to solve 8000= 95t+ (1/2)at2 and -95= at.

Substitute t= -95/a as you did and solve the quadratic equation.
 
Ahh, so I did. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
I used the formula

Vf^2 = Vo^2 +2ad
I found a from this. which was -0.564m/s^2

From there I went to the formula d= Vo+1/2at^2 and solved for time.
In which I got about 167 seconds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K