New Reply

1 + 2 + 3 +...+ (p-1)(mod p)

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Apr3-12, 07:00 PM   #1
 

1 + 2 + 3 +...+ (p-1)(mod p)


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
What is the value of 1 + 2 + 3 +...+ (p-1)(mod p)?


2. Relevant equations

p = 0 (mod p)
p-1 = -1 (mod p)
1 + 2 + 3 + ...+n = n(n+1)/2

3. The attempt at a solution

I know 1 + 2 + 3 +...+ (p-1) = (p-1)(p)/2

I worked the problem, but i don't know if i am correct:

work: i am looking for a b s.t.

b = (p-1)(p)/2 (mod p) or 2b = (p-1)(p) ( mod p)
we know (p-1) = -1 (mod p)
so : (p-1)p = -p (mod p)
this implies : 2b = -p(mod p) ,also we know p = 0 (mod p) so b =0 (mod p)

So the answer is 1 + 2 + 3 +...+ (p-1) = 0 (mod p)
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis
>> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt
>> Galaxy's Ring of Fire
Apr3-12, 07:19 PM   #2
 
Mentor
Quote by teddyayalew View Post
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
What is the value of 1 + 2 + 3 +...+ (p-1)(mod p)?


2. Relevant equations

p = 0 (mod p)
p-1 = -1 (mod p)
1 + 2 + 3 + ...+n = n(n+1)/2

3. The attempt at a solution

I know 1 + 2 + 3 +...+ (p-1) = (p-1)(p)/2

I worked the problem, but i don't know if i am correct:

work: i am looking for a b s.t.

b = (p-1)(p)/2 (mod p) or 2b = (p-1)(p) ( mod p)
we know (p-1) = -1 (mod p)
so : (p-1)p = -p (mod p)
this implies : 2b = -p(mod p) ,also we know p = 0 (mod p) so b =0 (mod p)

So the answer is 1 + 2 + 3 +...+ (p-1) = 0 (mod p)
I get different answers depending on whether p is even or odd.

For example, if p = 6, 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 ##\equiv## 3 (mod 6).

If p = 5, 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 ##\equiv## 0 (mod 5).
 
Apr3-12, 07:21 PM   #3
 
Mentor
BTW, what you're calculating is (1 + 2 + ... + (p -1))(mod p).
 
Apr3-12, 08:23 PM   #4
 

1 + 2 + 3 +...+ (p-1)(mod p)


Mark, I am sorry I was not clear, when I say p I mean a prime number.
 
Apr3-12, 08:32 PM   #5
 
Mentor
How about if p = 2, the only even prime?

1 ≠ 0 (mod 2)
 
Apr3-12, 08:34 PM   #6
 
Well, you have the right idea by writting
[tex]1+2+\cdots+(p-1) = \frac{(p-1)p}{2}[/tex]

But then you sort of take the long route to the eventual answer.

When you have this:
[tex]1 + \cdots + (p-1) = \frac{(p-1)p}{2}[/tex]

just note that [itex]p-1[/itex] is even so that [itex](p-1)/2[/itex] is an integer. Thus, the sum is divisible by [itex]p[/itex] and so the answer is [itex]0[/itex].

But, yes, your answer is correct.

EDIT:
As Mark mentioned, you'll have to do a special case for 2. In fact, this happens a lot in Number Theory.
 
Apr3-12, 08:48 PM   #7
 
I see.
So if p=2 then I know the sum is : 1 + 1 = 2, which is congruent to 0 mod 2 as well.

Thank you both for you help!
 
Apr3-12, 08:51 PM   #8
 
Mentor
Quote by teddyayalew View Post
I see.
So if p=2 then I know the sum is : 1 + 1 = 2, which is congruent to 0 mod 2 as well.

Thank you both for you help!
No. If p = 2, the sum has only one term (you quit at 2 - 1 = 1).
 
New Reply
Thread Tools