Physics virgin on freely falling objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter noodle21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Physics
Click For Summary
When a ball is dropped from a window and another is thrown upward simultaneously, they will meet at a point above the halfway mark between the window and the ground. The ball thrown upward starts with an initial velocity, while the dropped ball begins at rest, but both experience the same gravitational acceleration. Calculations show that they pass each other at three-quarters of the distance from the ground to the window. The effect of acceleration cancels out in this scenario, confirming that the initial speed of the thrown ball allows it to travel farther. Thus, the balls intersect at a height of 3/4 of the total distance from the ground to the window.
noodle21
You drop a ball from a window on an upper floor of a building. it strikes the ground with velocity v. You now repeat the drop, but have a friend down on the street who throws another ball upward at velocity v. Your friend throws the ball upward at exactly the same time that you drop yours from the window. At some location, the balls pass each other. Is this location at the halfway point between window and ground, above this point, or below this point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. You are in the wrong forum. This one is Quantum Mechanics. There is a forum for help with college physics.

2. Anyway, your friend's ball starts upward with a velocity v, but your ball starts with velocity = 0. So whose ball gets to the halfway point first? Think about it.
 
Originally posted by noodle21
You drop a ball from a window on an upper floor of a building. it strikes the ground with velocity v. You now repeat the drop, but have a friend down on the street who throws another ball upward at velocity v. Your friend throws the ball upward at exactly the same time that you drop yours from the window. At some location, the balls pass each other. Is this location at the halfway point between window and ground, above this point, or below this point?

Originally posted by krab
1. You are in the wrong forum. This one is Quantum Mechanics. There is a forum for help with college physics.

2. Anyway, your friend's ball starts upward with a velocity v, but your ball starts with velocity = 0. So whose ball gets to the halfway point first? Think about it.

Well, apparently it got moved! In your second comment, you seem to be implying that since the ball thrown up starts with speed v while the ball dropped starts with speed 0, the ball thrown will "move faster". Don't you think acceleration (and deceleration) will have something to do with it?

Suppose the window is h meters above the ground. Both balls have an acceleration of -g. The ball dropped will have speed (negative so downward) of v1(t)= -gt and the ball thrown upward will have speed (positive so upward) v2(t)= v- gt.

The height, at time t, of the dropped ball is
h1(t)= -(g/2)t2+ h while the height, at time t, of the thrown ball is h2(t)= vt- (g/2)t2.

However, v is not just some arbitrary speed. It is the speed the dropped ball has when it hits the ground: The dropped ball hits the ground when h1(t)= (-g/2)t2+ h= 0 or when
t= [sqrt](2h/g). At that time, v= -g([sqrt](2h/g)= -[sqrt](2hg).
Of course, the speed of the ball thrown up is [sqrt](2hg).

They will pass when they both have the same height at the same time:
-(g/2)t2+ h= [sqrt](2hg)t- (g/2)t2.
By golly, the accelerations cancel out! This reduces to
[sqrt](2hg)t= h so t= h/[sqrt](2hg)= [sqrt](h/2g).

At that time, h1= (-g/2)(h/2g)+ h= -h/4+ h= (3/4)h.
Of course, h2= [sqrt](2hg)[sqrt](h/2g)-(g/2)(h/2g)
= h- h/4= (3/4)h.

Well, I'll be! krab was right! The ball thrown upward, because it had the greater initial speed (and we DIDN'T have to take acceleration into account- it canceled out) goes farther. The two balls pass 3/4 of the way up to the window.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K