Unit Vector z in Spherical Terms: (1, 0, 0)

  • Thread starter Thread starter formulajoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing the unit vector in spherical coordinates at the point (2, 3, -4) and converting the position vector into rectangular terms. The subject area involves vector representation in different coordinate systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the requirements of the problem, particularly whether the task involves converting the position vector into a unit vector in spherical coordinates. There is discussion about the implications of the vector's direction and magnitude, as well as the interpretation of the unit vector's relationship to the z-axis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have expressed doubts about the original poster's understanding of the task, while others are questioning the assumptions regarding the vector's orientation and the conversion process.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the exact nature of the problem, particularly whether it involves expressing a unit vector parallel to the z-axis or one that aligns with the position vector (2, 3, -4). Participants are also considering the implications of the coordinates and the definitions of unit vectors.

formulajoe
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
at (2,3,-4) express the unit vector z in spherical terms.
express the unit vector r in rectangular terms.

for the first part, would it just be (1,X,0)
fi should be zero because that's the angle the line makes with the z axis, and since this is going to be parallel to the z-axis this should be zero and theta shouldn't matter. and the unit vector r should just be the point made into a vector right? since the unit vector r is pointing away from the origin. so at (2,3,-4) its going to be in the direction of (2,3,-4).
should it have a different magnitude?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume (2,3,-4) describes a position vector

By definition a unit vector is a vector with a magnitude of 1.
so in the rectangular system, you result should be a vector with the same direction of (2,3,-4) but with a magnitude of 1.

for your answer in spherical coordinates it seems wrong, but maybe I am misunderstanding the question... It seems that you are asking to convert the position vector (2,3,-4) into a unit vector and give the answer in spherical coordinates. Is that right? if so then your answer is incorrect as it is not parallel to the z axis since it has both nonzero x and y components and thus would make an angle wrt both the z axis and the x axis.
 
(2,3,-4) is a point. it wants me to represent the z unit vector in the spherical system. basically i think it wants me to represent the z unit vector from that point using spherical coordinates.
 
I really doubt that is what they are asking you, because that is basically pointless, If it is, than I don't know what to tell you,,, I'm not saying its impossible, but I wouldn't know. It seems much more likely that they want you to describe the unit vector having the same direction as the position vector (2,3,-4) but in spherical coordinates.
 
heres exactly what it says
at point T(2,3,-4) express a sub z in the spherical system and a sub r in the rectangular system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K