Register to reply 
Expanding the electromagnetic hamiltonian 
Share this thread: 
#1
May1512, 10:10 AM

P: 3

This isn't a homework problem  I can't understand a particular statement in my professor's notes. As such, I hope it's in the correct forum.
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data The Hamiltonian for a charged particle in a potential field A is [itex]\hat{H}[/itex] = (1/2m) ( i [itex]\hbar[/itex] [itex]\nabla[/itex]  q A)[itex]^{2}[/itex] The square bracket can be expanded. 2. Relevant equations In my professor's notes, this expands to [itex]\hat{H}[/itex] = (1/2m) ( [itex]\hbar[/itex][itex]^{2}[/itex][itex]\nabla[/itex][itex]^{2}[/itex] + q[itex]^{2}[/itex]A[itex]^{2}[/itex] + 2 q i [itex]\hbar[/itex] A[itex]\bullet \nabla[/itex] + q i [itex]\hbar[/itex] ( [itex]\nabla \bullet [/itex] A ) 3. The attempt at a solution When I attempt the expansion myself, I don't get the factor of 2 present in the 3rd term of the expansion. I know that it must be there  subsequent proofs using the Landau gauge don't work without it  but I don't understand where it came from. Any help in understanding the reasoning behind this would be greatly appreciated. 


#2
May1512, 10:30 AM

P: 317

Always be careful when you have an operator like the gradient operator. It is not meaningful to just expand out the binomial product and write [itex]A\cdot \nabla[/itex], because that must be acting on something. So the way to expand the Hamiltonian is to write it acting on a wavefunction, [itex]\hat{H}f = \frac{1}{2m} (i \hbar \nabla  q\vec{A})^2 f[/itex]; if you do that, you'll see where the factor of 2 came from (if you correctly apply the product rule).



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Hamiltonian mechanics electromagnetic field  Advanced Physics Homework  0  
Commutator of the Hamiltonian with Position and Hamiltonian with Momentum  Advanced Physics Homework  2  
Since the universe is expanding does this mean Quantum Particles are expanding too?  Quantum Physics  5  
Expanding people in an expanding universe?  Special & General Relativity  36 