Finding Limits of Sequences: How to Determine N Values for Given Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Sequences
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding limits of sequences, specifically focusing on the sequence defined by a_n = n/α^n, where α is greater than 1. Participants explore how to determine specific values of N such that the sequence remains below certain thresholds as n increases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to find minimum values N_1, N_2, and N_3 for which the sequence a_n is less than specified values (1/10, 1/100, 1/1000) for n greater than these N values. There is a mention of using guess and check methods versus deriving values from the sequence's behavior.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested using inequalities to derive N values, while others are questioning whether the approach should involve guess and check methods or more formal proofs. There is an ongoing exploration of how to apply epsilon-delta definitions in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is derived from a textbook and express a desire to understand the reasoning behind the values they calculate or derive. There is also mention of the potential complexity of the limits as ε becomes smaller.

courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Hello all:

Given [tex]a_n = \frac {n}{\alpha^n}[/tex] and [tex]\alpha[/tex] is a number greater than 1, we assert as n increases the sequence of numbers [tex]a_n = \frac {n}{\alpha^n}[/tex] tends to the limit 0.

Let us consider the sequence [tex]\sqrt a_n = \frac {\sqrt n}{(\sqrt \alpha)^n}[/tex]

We put [tex]\sqrt \alpha = 1+h[/tex] where [tex]h > 0[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt \alpha^n = (1+h)^n > 1+nh[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt a_n = \frac {\sqrt n}{(1+h)^n} \leq \frac {\sqrt n}{1+nh} \leq \frac {\sqrt n}{nh} = \frac {1}{h\sqrt n}[/tex]

[tex]a_n \leq \frac {1}{nh^2}[/tex] and [tex]a_n \rightarrow 0[/tex]

Now my question is: Suppose you are asked to find numbers [tex]N_1, N_2, N_3[/tex] such that

(a) [tex]\frac {n}{2^n} < \frac {1}{10}[/tex] for every [tex]n > N_1[/tex]
(b) [tex]\frac {n}{2^n} < \frac {1}{100}[/tex] for every [tex]n > N_2[/tex]
(c) [tex]\frac {n}{2^n} < \frac {1}{1000}[/tex] for every [tex]n > N_3[/tex]

Do I have to guess and check for these numbers or can I somehow use the proof of this sequence? Because what if [tex]\epsilon[/tex] becomes smaller and smaller? Then there must be some method to find [tex]N_1, N_2, N_3[/tex]

Thanks a lot for any help or advice

EDIT: Its [tex]\frac {n}{2^n} < \frac {1}{10}[/tex] for every [tex]n > N_1[/tex] and the same with the others
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your case here: [tex]\alpha = 2[/tex] Solve for h.

You want [tex]a_n<\frac{1}{10}[/tex]. If you know that [tex]\frac{1}{nh^2}<\frac{1}{10}[/tex] then that means that [tex]a_n<\frac{1}{10}[/tex].

So from [tex]\frac{1}{nh^2}<\frac{1}{10}[/tex] you can get the n value you need. This will give you an N1 such that if n>N1, [tex]a_n<\frac{1}{10}[/tex]

But are you looking for the minimum N1 such that if n>N1 then [tex]a_n<\frac{1}{10}[/tex], or are you just looking for any N1 such that if n>N1 then [tex]a_n<\frac{1}{10}[/tex]? If you're looking for the minimum N1, then you might want to want to calculate [tex]a_{N1}[/tex] and make sure that it is >=1/10.
 
i am looking for the minimum [tex]N_1[/tex]


I know that for part (a) [tex]N_1 = 6[/tex] buy why?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
courtrigrad said:
i am looking for the minimum [tex]N_1[/tex]

Then I think you'd just have to plug it in and check.

Are you trying to do an epsilon-delta proof to show that the limit is 0? Then it is sufficient to show that for every epsilon>0, there is some N such that for n>N |a(n)-0|<epsilon or in other words show that a(n)<epsilon. I'm guess that the 1/10, 1/100 are different choices for epsilon?
 
any other ideas?

thanks
 
so i take it that the only way to find the smallest numbers would be by guess and check? Because after solving for n i get 64.

This is from Courant's book by the way (i am a high school student)

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Thanks anyway for your help
 
Same concept Different Limit

Ok so let's say we have [tex]a_n = \sqrt n+1 - \sqrt n[/tex] and we want to find numbers [tex]N_1, N_2, N_3[/tex] such that

[tex]\sqrt n+1 - \sqrt n < \frac {1}{10}[/tex] for every [tex]n > N_1[/tex]
[tex]\sqrt n+1 - \sqrt n < \frac {1}{100}[/tex] for every [tex]n > N_2[/tex]
[tex]\sqrt n+1 - \sqrt n < \frac {1}{1000}[/tex] for every [tex]n > N_3[/tex]

Now since [tex]\sqrt n+1 - \sqrt n = \frac {(\sqrt n+1 - \sqrt n)(\sqrt n+1 + \sqrt n)}{\sqrt n+1 + \sqrt n} = \frac {1}{\sqrt n+1 + \sqrt n}<br /> <br /> How would i obtain [tex]N_1, N_2 ,N_3[/tex]?<br /> <br /> PS: I know if I solve the equation I get <b> a </b> [tex]N_1 N_2 N_3[/tex] but I want to get the least of all of them<br /> <br /> Any help is appreciated (as with the first one do I just guess and check?)<br /> <br /> Thanks[/tex]
 
hmmm, i i think i have to substitute values in lless than the solved value?

thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K