Covariance of the Wave Equation in Modern Physics: A Proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the covariance of the wave equation with respect to Galilean transformations, specifically examining the function y=Asin(2pi(x/lambda - ft)). The original poster seeks clarification on the correct approach to demonstrate this covariance or lack thereof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether to apply the law on primed variables or to make substitutions first. Some participants inquire about the form of Galilean transformations and suggest writing the wave function in the primed system. Others express confusion regarding the formulas presented and emphasize the need to check if the transformed wave function satisfies the transformed wave equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the transformation process, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or outcome.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of demonstrating covariance or non-covariance without providing complete solutions. There is mention of an attachment with key steps, but the clarity of the formulas is questioned.

mike217
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Question: Show that the wave equation is in not covariant with respect to Gallilean transformations, given the function y=Asin(2pi(x/lambda - ft))

My main question is inorder to show the covariance of a law, should I apply the law on the primed variables and show that it is satisfied by applying a transformation, or should I make the substitution, apply the law, and then show it is satisfied.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting problem.Reminds me of the days when "Lorentz covariance" was unknown to me.
Do you know the form of a Galilei transformation??If so,write y(x,t) in the 'primed' system.

Daniel.
 
Thanks for your reply Daniel.

I have worked on this problem, but the result that I am getting is that the wave equation under the Gallilean transformation is satisfied. Please view key steps of my solution in the attachement.
 

Attachments

  • 1.gif
    1.gif
    2.2 KB · Views: 567
  • 2.gif
    2.gif
    2.9 KB · Views: 503
  • 3.GIF
    3.GIF
    2.5 KB · Views: 538
I'm sorry,but i couldn't understand your formulas.
To show that the wave function (and hence the wave equation) is not invariant under the Group of Galilean transformations (is not Galilei covariant) means to see whether the transformed wavefunction:

WVFCT--------->GT (WVFCT)'

satisfies or not the transformed wave equation:

WVEQ--------->GT (WVEQ)'

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K