Non-standard calculus (infinitesimals)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a calculus problem involving non-standard analysis, specifically focusing on the computation of the standard part of a given expression as H approaches positive infinity. Participants are exploring the implications of treating H as an infinite number and the algebraic manipulations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the expression and the validity of dividing by infinite quantities. There is a suggestion to consider limits as H approaches infinity, and some participants explore algebraic tricks for simplification.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants clarifying misunderstandings about non-standard analysis and the properties of infinite numbers. Some guidance has been offered regarding algebraic manipulation, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are references to terminology differences in non-standard analysis, such as the use of "unlimited" instead of "infinite." Participants are also navigating the complexities of hyperreal numbers and their properties in relation to standard calculus.

danne89
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Compute the standard part of this, please:
[tex]\frac{ \sqrt{H+1}}{ \sqrt{2H} + \sqrt{H-1}}[/tex], where H is positive infinite.

It probably should be some algebra trick I'm not familar with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
infinite can't divided by infinite... your question doesn't make sense at all
I think what you meant was...
[tex]\lim_{H \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\sqrt{H+1}}{\sqrt{2H}+\sqrt{H-1}}[/tex]

hints:
for a very large [itex]H[/itex], you can assume [itex]\sqrt{H+1}= \sqrt{H}[/itex]
 
No, vincent, he meant what he said. As the title said, this is "non-standard analysis" in which we have both infinite numbers and infinitesmals. (H is a positive infinite number.)

However, the result will be exactly the same as the lim as H-> infinity.

And, yes, it is true that for "infinite" H, H+1= H, H-1= H. This is exactly the same as
[tex]\frac{\sqrt{H}}{\sqrt{2H}+\sqrt{H}}= \frac{\sqrt{H}}{(\sqrt{2}+1)\sqrt{H}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}+1}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One algebra trick, it so happens, is exactly the same as standard analysis: divide the numerator and denominator by the "highest power" of H... in this case, it's 1/2.



And, yes, it is true that for "infinite" H, H+1= H, H-1= H.

That's incorrect: H+1 is never equal to H for any hyperreal, even the unlimited ones. (I think unlimited is the preferred term, over infinite or transfinite)

The unlimited hyperreals don't act like cardinal numbers -- they act like real numbers, in a very real sense. (Pun intended)


However, H/(H+1) would be a limited (aka finite) number with standard part 1, so that could be used fruitfully in this example, by replacing (H+1) with H * ((H+1) / H).
 
Ahh I see! It's really just a beginner calculus book, although it used infinitesimals.
 
Ah! Thanks for clearing up my error, Hurkyl. An expert on non-standard analysis I'm not. (I'm barely competent on STANDARD analysis!)
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K