Jan25-05, 03:43 AM
I'm not sure if this is correct spot for analysing the logic in the climate change discussion. But it's about logic and not about global warming. So we give it a shot.
Let's meet Stephen Schneider
I will not comment here, that would be risking poisoning the well. Only notice that SS is a scientist in the field of climate change.
Now perhaps check out his homepage, a narration about climate change. Let's focus on the page Contrarians
Now I do wonder if we see either a skillfull logical refuting of the opponents or the most dense concentration of fallacies per sentence ever.
What would it be?
|Register to reply|
|Climate Change Poll||Current Events||157|
|Who Believes In Climate Change??||General Discussion||13|
|Can Enough Windwills Cause Climate Change?||General Physics||7|
|Climate change: the future.||Earth||19|
|In the meantime, what about climate change..?||Current Events||20|