Directionality of sound vs. frequency

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tinkeringone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Sound
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Low frequency sounds, such as those around 34 Hz, disperse omni-directionally due to their longer wavelengths (approximately 10 meters), while high frequency sounds, like 3.4 kHz (100 mm wavelength), are more directional. This phenomenon is governed by diffraction principles, where the ratio of the aperture size to the wavelength (R) determines the wave propagation angle. For apertures larger than the wavelength, interference occurs, leading to cancellation of sound waves at certain angles. Conversely, smaller apertures allow low frequencies to diffract around obstacles, while high frequencies are blocked or reflected.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound wave properties, including frequency and wavelength
  • Basic knowledge of diffraction principles in physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of wave interference
  • Awareness of human hearing frequency ranges
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of wave diffraction and interference
  • Study the relationship between frequency and wavelength in sound waves
  • Explore the effects of obstacles on sound propagation
  • Learn about sound source radiation patterns and their directional characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Acoustics engineers, sound designers, audio engineers, and anyone interested in the physics of sound propagation and its applications in real-world environments.

tinkeringone
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Why do low frequency sounds (like low bass notes) disperse omni-directionally, whereas high frequency sounds are much more directional?
Also is there a formula that governs this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diffraction

The same effect applies to water waves, radio waves and other electromagnetic radiation.

Consider a wave proceeding through a narrow aperture. Assume that the aperture is large compared to the wavelength and call the ratio between them R.

If the wave propagates at an angle of arcsin(1/R) to the left then the resulting wave form will interfere with itself, completely cancelling out. The part of the wave going through at the right edge will be exactly one cycle behind the part of the wave going through at the left edge.

[If you measure angles in radians then arcsin(1/R) ~= 1/R and you can simplify the formula accordingly]

For apertures that are small compared to the wavelength, there is no such interference regardless of angle and the wave simply spreads out.


And now I start waving my hands furiously...

Consider an obstacle around which a wave is propagating. The situation is exactly symmetric. The "shadow" of this object will have the same shape as the diffraction pattern from an aperture.

So if you have an obstacle that is 5 wavelengths in extent, you will have a shadow whose edges are at an angle of about 1/5 radians.

And if you have an obstacle that is less than one wavelength in extent, you will not have a noticible shadow at all.

For a fixed size object, this means that large wavelengths go around and for short wavelengths, the object casts shadows.


I'm no expert on this stuff and am working from first principles here, so forgive me if there are more apt descriptions or better formulas.
 
One thing missing from post #2 was the wavelengths involved. A low frequency sound (say about 34 Hz) has a wavelength of 10m. A high pitched sound of say 3.4 kHz (whcih is about the most sensitive frequency for human hearing) has a wavelength of 100mm. At the upper frequency limit for humans the wavelength is about 20mm.

Many objects in the environment have sizes in between those limits, so they block or reflect high frequencies, but low frequences just diffract around them (remember to think in 3D - e.g. for a row of houses, low frequency sound will diffract over the roofs, not get blocked by the relatively small "gaps" between the houses)

Another issue is that sound sources usually radiate high frequencies much more directionally that low frequencies, for the same basic reason - the size of the object generating the sound. compared with the wavelength being generated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K