Order of Operations: PEMDAS & Beyond

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter C0nfused
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operations
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the order of operations in mathematics, specifically focusing on the acronym PEMDAS and its implications. Participants explore the foundational principles behind the order of operations, the treatment of parentheses, and the associative properties of various operations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether operations within parentheses should also follow PEMDAS, suggesting that the order of operations applies recursively within parentheses.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of the distributive property and the definitions of division and subtraction in establishing the order of operations.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the acronym PEMDAS, with one participant providing a mnemonic to aid memory.
  • There is a discussion about the associative properties of operations, noting that most operations are left associative, while exponents are right associative, which affects the outcome of expressions.
  • Examples are provided to illustrate how different groupings of operations can lead to different results, particularly with exponents and division.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of certainty about the definitions and implications of the order of operations. While some points are clarified, there remains a lack of consensus on certain aspects, particularly regarding the foundational reasoning behind the order of operations and the treatment of nested parentheses.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of operations and their properties are not explicitly stated, which may affect the understanding of the order of operations. The discussion does not resolve whether the order of operations is purely a convention or if it can be proven from axiomatic foundations.

C0nfused
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
I want to ask some things about the order of operation. Of course I have heard and used PEMDAS! First of all i want to make this clear: we say that first we should calculate the parentheses: in order to do so we also use PEMDAS in each parenthesis to calculate it's value? I am almost sure about the answer but just want to confirm it. And the most important thing: how was the "right" order of operations decided? Is it just a convention that always gives right results in connection with the axioms that we have set for addition and multiplication? Can it be proved?
Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes,it's a direct result of the axioms.Distributivity of the multiplication towards addition is very important...Defining the division as the multiplication with the inverse,too...Defining subtraction as the addition with the oppose,too...

Could please explain the acronym??

Daniel.
 
Thanks for your answer. One thing that i think was not cleared: have we defined that parentheses should be calculated before anything else and that in order to calculate them ,we treat them as separate arithmetical expressions and we apply the "right"order of operations inside them too(and if they also contain parentheses we continue doing the same thing)? (Is this right? i think it is)

PEMDAS=parentheses.exponents.multiplication.division.addition.substraction!
 
Also know as "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sarah".
Do what ever is in (P)arentheses first (and,as was the point of this question apply "PEDMAS" inside those parentheses), the evaluate exponentials, then multiplications, then divisions. After those, evaluate addition, then subtraction.

Actually, after the parentheses, these group into two simple blocks. It really doesn't matter in which order you evaluate exponentials, multiplications, and divisions and it really doesn't matter in which order you do the additions and subtractions: as long as you do ALL of the first group before ANY of the second group. Of course, that doesn't give a cute acronym.
 
Thanks for your help
 
Exponentials do have to go first:

2^(3*4) is certainly different than (2^3)*4...

And you have to remember that most of the operations are left associative, meaning you're supposed to do them from left to right. It matters, for example, with:

1/2*3, because this means (1/2)*3, and that's different than 1/(2*3).

Similarly for subtraction:

1-2-3 means (1-2)-3 which is different than 1-(2-3)

A gotcha is that exponents are right associative: 3^4^5 means 3^(4^5), not (3^4)^5.
 
Exponentials do have to go first:

2^(3*4) is certainly different than (2^3)*4...

And you have to remember that most of the operations are left associative, meaning you're supposed to do them from left to right. It matters, for example, with:

1/2*3, because this means (1/2)*3, and that's different than 1/(2*3).

Similarly for subtraction:

1-2-3 means (1-2)-3 which is different than 1-(2-3)

A gotcha is that exponents are right associative: 3^4^5 means 3^(4^5), not (3^4)^5.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K