Gravitation Potential Energy Help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of energy required to place a mass M into orbit near the Earth's surface compared to the energy needed to send it into distant space. The subject area includes gravitational potential energy and orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concepts of binding energy and total mechanical energy in the context of gravitational fields. There are attempts to derive formulas and clarify the conditions for orbit versus escape.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the formulas related to gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, while others express uncertainty about the lack of specific values needed for calculations. Multiple interpretations of the energy ratio are being discussed, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted absence of specific numerical values, which is affecting the ability to compute the energy ratio. Participants are also questioning the assumptions regarding the conditions for orbit and escape.

krypt0nite
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Calculate the ratio of the energy that would be required to put a mass M into orbit near the Earth's surface (if there were no friction) and the energy to put the same into distant space.

I'm stuck. How am i suppose to calculate the ratio. I know the that the energy to put M into orbit near the Earth's surface would be a small positive energy while putting it into distant space would be a large positive energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The signs are purely conventional.Actually for gravitational potential energy,it is MINUS INSTEAD OF PLUS...
The gravity field of a spherically symmetric celestial body (i.e.Earth) is CONSERVATIVE,which means u can apply the law of conservation of total energy.

Can u compute the energy required to put a mass into orbit near the surface of the Earth??

Daniel.
 
There are no values given to me so i don't know how to compute it
 
I'm not sure how to find the answer, but I can tell you this: Binding energy is the additional energy you have to supply a satellite (or anything in orbit) to escape the Earth's gravitational field. This is the formula for it:
[tex]E_{binding}=\frac{Gm_1m_2}{2r}[/tex]

When a satellite is in orbit, it's total energy (total mechanical energy) is:
[tex]E_{mechanical}=-\frac{Gm_1m_2}{2r}[/tex]

So I guess the ratio would be 1:1?
 
Not really.The second formula doesn't hold for bodies on the Earth (which do not orbit,hence do not have KE),so i guess the OP is correct.The problem is missing some data...

Daniel.
 
Wouldn't the "r" be different values so I don't think they can be 1:1?
I was thinking more like 1:1/r ratio would make sense.
 
krypt0nite said:
Calculate the ratio of the energy that would be required to put a mass M into orbit near the Earth's surface (if there were no friction) and the energy to put the same into distant space.

I'm stuck. How am i suppose to calculate the ratio. I know the that the energy to put M into orbit near the Earth's surface would be a small positive energy while putting it into distant space would be a large positive energy.
For near Earth orbit:

[tex]mv^2/R = F = GMm/R^2[/tex]

Which is:
(1)[tex]2KE = GMm/R[/tex]
where KE is the kinetic energy of the orbiting body, which is just -1/2 * its gravitational potential at radius R.

The condition for distant space (escape) is:

[tex]PE \ge 0[/tex]

You should see from (1) that [itex]2KE_{orbit} + PE_{orbit} = 0[/itex], which means that the kinetic energy required for escape is ______ the KE for orbit. I think that should help you answer the question.

AM
 
So ratio would be 1:2?
 
krypt0nite said:
So ratio would be 1:2?
If you mean: Kinetic energy of escape = 2 KE of orbit, then yes.

AM
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K