Power Series Sum: Summing (x^n/(n²+2n)) from n=1 to ∞

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bulbanos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the summation of the series \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n^2 + 2n} \), focusing on both the radius of convergence and the evaluation of the infinite sum. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and techniques related to power series and convergence criteria.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest factoring the denominator as \( \frac{1}{n^2 + 2n} = \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{1}{n} - \frac{1}{n+2} \right) \) to rewrite the series.
  • One participant proposes expressing the series in terms of integrals, indicating a potential connection to known series expansions.
  • Another participant cautions about manipulating terms in a conditionally convergent series, noting that convergence behavior may differ based on the value of \( x \).
  • There is a suggestion that the series may resemble a telescoping sum, with a detailed exploration of partial sums provided.
  • One participant points out a typo in the evaluation of \( S(1) \) and questions the notation regarding the modulus of \( x \), leading to clarification about the intended conditions for convergence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the manipulation of the series and its convergence properties. There is no consensus on the best approach to evaluate the sum or the implications of the convergence criteria.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential issues with conditional convergence and the implications of manipulating series terms. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the convergence behavior for different values of \( x \).

bulbanos
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
sum(x^n/(n²+2n),n=1..infinity)

we've never heard of hypergeom functions and we encountered this on our exam. The question was not only the radius of convergence but the infinite sum as well.

Anyone an idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bulbanos said:
sum(x^n/(n²+2n),n=1..infinity)

we've never heard of hypergeom functions and we encountered this on our exam. The question was not only the radius of convergence but the infinite sum as well.

Anyone an idea?

1.Factor the denominator:

[tex]\frac{1}{n^{2}+2n}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+2}})[/tex] (1)

Write your series like:
[tex]S(x)=\frac{1}{2}(\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{x^{n}}{n}-\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{x^{n}}{n+2})[/tex]

Daniel.

P.S.I don't know how u can connect your series with the hypergeomtric ones.I'll think about it...
 
Last edited:
Continue by writing:
[tex]S(x)=\frac{1}{2}(\int_{0}^{x}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}t^{n-1})dt-\frac{1}{x^{2}}\int_{0}^{x}(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}t^{n+1})dt))=[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{2}(\int_{0}^{x}\frac{dt}{1-t}-\frac{1}{x^{2}}\int_{0}^{x}\frac{t^{2}dt}{1-t})[/tex]
or something like that..
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
1.Factor the denominator:

[tex]\frac{1}{n^{2}+2n}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+2}})[/tex] (1)

Write your series like:
[tex]S(x)=\frac{1}{2}(\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{x^{n}}{n}-\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{x^{n}}{n+2})[/tex]

You're moving terms in a conditionally convergent sequence which is not always kosher. Specifically, in this case, if [itex]x=1[/itex] the original series is convergent, while yours is not.

I can suggest an alternative approach:
As you pointed out:
[tex]\frac{1}{n^{2}+2n}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{x^n}{n}-\frac{x^n}{n+2}})[/tex]
This looks suspicously like a telescoping sum. Let's take a look at partial sums
[tex]S(x,k)=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=1}^{k}\left(\frac{x^n}{n}-\frac{x^n}{n+2}}\right)[/tex]
In the [itex]x=1[/itex] this is very nice:
[tex]S(1,k)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\left(\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{3}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{5}\right)+...\left(\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}{k+2}\right)\right)[/tex]
Now, the negative
[itex]\frac{1}{3}[/itex]
from the first term will cancel with the positve
[itex]\frac{1}{3}[/itex]
from the 3rd term. Similarly, for the negative elements in each of the following terms except for the last two. This means that the sum telescopes to:
[tex]S(1,k)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{k+1}-\frac{1}{k+2}\right)[/tex]
so
[tex]S(1)=\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

It's pretty obvious that for [itex]|x|<1[/itex] the series are absolutely convergent (so Dex's approach will work) and for [tex]|x|>1[/tex] the series will be divergent since the individual terms will grow without bound.
 
Last edited:
There's a typo
[tex]S(1)=\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

What do you mean by
[tex]|x|<0[/tex]

Isn't the modulus ALWAYS REAL AND NONEGATIVE??

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
There's a typo
[tex]S(1)=\frac{3}{4}[/tex]
Right, forgot the [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex].
[/QUOTE]
What do you mean by
[tex]|x|<0[/tex]
Isn't the modulus ALWAYS REAL AND NONEGATIVE??[/QUOTE]

I meant to say [itex]|x|<1[/itex] and [itex]|x|>1[/itex].


(Will edit the post.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K