New Reply

Potential at the end of a rod

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jul26-12, 09:50 PM   #1
 

Potential at the end of a rod


Hi all!

So I've been doing some work with potential calculations, and I seem to be running into a bit of trouble with figuring out how to think about the potential due to a rod at the very edge of it.

Imagine an insulating rod with charge Q is placed along the positive x-axis, with its left end at the origin. I can calculate the potential anywhere on the y-axis, and anywhere on the negative x-axis quite easily. But when I try to take the limiting case of a point at the left end of the rod, something strange happens: I can let y approach 0, or x approach 0 in either of the expressions, and I find that the potential at the end of the rod is infinite. This is because the potential contains the natural log.

I contend that this doesn't make physical sense! You see, what if I had instead charged the rod to a charge Q+q. If the potential when charge Q is already on the rod is infinite at the end, how can I place the extra bit q on the rod? But I know that Q can have any value, which means I should be able to make Q large enough that it includes that extra bit, had I wanted to from the start.
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Promising doped zirconia
>> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease
>> Bringing life into focus
Jul26-12, 10:41 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
I don't understand. Why are you trying to find the potential between 2 points on the rod if the rod is charged with Q? Wouldn't there be 0 potential?
 
Jul26-12, 10:45 PM   #3
 
I think not- for one, it's not a conductor, and for two this is relative to a 0 potential at infinity, the way that I'm thinking about it (I'm integrating dV over the entire rod to get V, but this all presupposes that V=0 at infinite distances).
 
Jul26-12, 11:01 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

Potential at the end of a rod


Quote by schaefera View Post
I think not- for one, it's not a conductor, and for two this is relative to a 0 potential at infinity, the way that I'm thinking about it (I'm integrating dV over the entire rod to get V, but this all presupposes that V=0 at infinite distances).
Do you have a charge on the end of the rod, or is the whole rod charged?
 
Jul27-12, 12:32 AM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by schaefera View Post
Imagine an insulating rod with charge Q is placed along the positive x-axis, with its left end at the origin. I can calculate the potential anywhere on the y-axis, and anywhere on the negative x-axis quite easily. But when I try to take the limiting case of a point at the left end of the rod, something strange happens: I can let y approach 0, or x approach 0 in either of the expressions, and I find that the potential at the end of the rod is infinite. This is because the potential contains the natural log.
I contend that this doesn't make physical sense!
The defiance of physical sense reflects the unreality of the model. A uniform charge over a one-dimensional manifold will always produce infinite potential on the manifold itself.
To avoid this you need to make it at least 2 dimensional, but might as well make it 3. 5.8.7 in http://www.astro.uvic.ca/~tatum/celmechs/celm5.pdf derives the (gravitational) potential due to a uniform solid cylinder.
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Potential at the end of a rod
Thread Forum Replies
Electrochemical potential, chemical potential and Fermi levels. Ashcroft is confusing Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
Potential step with infinite potential barrier (D.A.B Miller problem 2.8.6) Advanced Physics Homework 8
Describing chemical potential in Galvanic cell using Coulomb Force/Electric Potential Classical Physics 0
Electric Potential Difference Question (Parallel plates, higher potential) Introductory Physics Homework 1
Electric potential, potential difference, and potential energy Introductory Physics Homework 2