What determines which metals will reflect or absorb electromagnetic waves?

In summary, the reflectivity or absorbance of metals towards electromagnetic waves is determined by their physical properties, specifically the arrangement of electrons in their atomic structure. Metals with loosely bound electrons, such as silver and gold, have high reflectivity due to the ease with which their electrons can be excited and reemit incoming waves. On the other hand, metals with tightly bound electrons, such as iron and copper, have high absorbance as their electrons readily absorb and dissipate energy from incoming waves. Other factors such as the wavelength and angle of incidence also play a role in determining a metal's reflectivity or absorbance.
  • #1
pa5tabear
175
0
Why does nickel reflect infrared, but gold does not?

I've seen devices that shine infrared at a metal surface and measure the reflectance. They're mainly used for looking at thin film coatings.

For example, you could have a metal part made of nickel, and thinly coated in gold. The gold thin film will not reflect the infrared, but the nickel will. This allows you to see how clean your surface is, because if there are other contaminants on the metal part, the reflectance will be much lower.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I thought gold did? Isn't that why spacecraft are wrapped in the stuff? To reflect the suns heat?
 
  • #3
CWatters said:
I thought gold did? Isn't that why spacecraft are wrapped in the stuff? To reflect the suns heat?

I'm guessing it reflects some spectra but not others. I was told that the tool I saw was calibrated to pass through gold but be reflected by nickel.
 
  • #4
I think the reasoning is different. A nickel surface is covered with nickel oxide, while a gold surface is an atomar surface to which pollutant gasses will only be adsorbed reversibly. Hence you can infer from the change of reflectivity something on the properties of the adsorbed gasses.
 
  • #5
DrDu said:
I think the reasoning is different. A nickel surface is covered with nickel oxide, while a gold surface is an atomar surface to which pollutant gasses will only be adsorbed reversibly. Hence you can infer from the change of reflectivity something on the properties of the adsorbed gasses.

This could explain the spaceship case.

What about the case I was talking about, with a nickel body covered in a gold thin film? In that instance there wouldn't be much, if any, oxide formation on the nickel. It should basically be a pure nickel source reflecting the infrared. Does the thickness of the metal matter? For example, if the gold were 1 cm thick, instead of one micron thick, would the gold then reflect or absorb the infrared?
 
  • #6
Probably you are using gold plated nickel because a massive mirror from gold would be too expensive? As long as we don't know better the device you are talking about, it will be difficult to help you more.
 
  • #8
Solid surfaces reflect most that radiation they also absorb. Gold is the best reflector in the infrared. Mirrors for optical instruments are coated by gold.

Because of the high reflection, only a little part of the incident light energy enters into the metal. Travelling in the metal, the intensity of the wave exponentially decreases with the distance travelled: I=I0e-αd. α, the absorption coefficient is related to the imaginary part of the complex refractive index, κ, and the wavelength λ: κ=αλ/(4π).

The reflectivity of a surface is determined by the refractive index. If its real part is n, imaginary part is κ:
R=[(n-1)22]/[(n+1)22]

Metals have high n and κ values in the infrared range so the surface reflectivity is close to 1.
The reflectance of gold is less in the visible range, and it changes with wavelength. The optical properties and their wavelength dependence are determined by the electronic structure of the metal and the arrangement of the atoms in the metal crystal or layer. ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #9
ehild said:
Solid surfaces reflect most that radiation they also absorb.

That is not true for highly reflective substances like metals. As most of the light is reflected, hardly any energy is absorbed. In the case of gold, the yellow colour is due to reduced reflection in regions where there are absorption lines due to transitions from d-orbitals to the conduction band.
In the infrared the absorbance α is very small.
Stated differently, the value of absorbance α is quite small although κ is large. However the large value of κ is due to the large value of λ (respectively n).
 
  • #11
I just wanted to say that absorption will rather lead to a decrease of reflection, specifically in the optical region:
The reflectivity of gold is described (at least somewhat below the plasma frequency) well by the Drude formula, see e.g.
http://optics.hanyang.ac.kr/~shsong/27-Metals.pdf
Parameters can be found here:
http://www.wave-scattering.com/drudefit.html
According to this formula the n and κ are well approximated (from the mid IR up to the visible) as
[itex] \kappa=\omega_\mathrm{P}/\omega[/itex] and [itex]n=\kappa \gamma/\omega [/itex].
In the mid to far IR, both n and κ are large so that the reflectivity is almost 1.
However near the visible, κ is not very large but n is very small as long as the parameter γ, which describes damping, is small. Then there is again almost perfect reflection. But if absorption, ie a large value of γ, reflectivity will decrease.
 

1. What is the difference between reflection and absorption of electromagnetic waves?

The reflection of electromagnetic waves refers to the bouncing back of the waves when they encounter a surface. This is similar to how a ball bounces off a wall. On the other hand, absorption of electromagnetic waves refers to the transfer of energy from the waves to the material they encounter, causing the waves to dissipate.

2. How do the properties of metals affect their ability to reflect or absorb electromagnetic waves?

Metals have free electrons that are able to move freely within the material. This allows them to easily interact with electromagnetic waves, making them good reflectors. However, the specific properties of metals, such as their density and thickness, can also affect their ability to absorb or reflect waves.

3. What is the role of the frequency and wavelength of electromagnetic waves in their reflection and absorption?

The frequency and wavelength of electromagnetic waves play a crucial role in their interaction with metals. Generally, metals are better at reflecting shorter wavelength, high-frequency waves. This is because the free electrons in metals are able to easily interact with these waves, causing them to reflect rather than absorb them.

4. Can the surface texture of metals affect their ability to reflect or absorb electromagnetic waves?

Yes, the surface texture of metals can affect their ability to reflect or absorb electromagnetic waves. A smooth surface has less surface area for the waves to interact with and is therefore a better reflector. On the other hand, a rough or textured surface can cause the waves to scatter and be absorbed more easily.

5. Are there any other factors besides the properties of metals that can determine their ability to reflect or absorb electromagnetic waves?

Yes, there are other factors that can affect the reflection and absorption of electromagnetic waves by metals. These include the angle at which the waves hit the surface, the thickness of the metal, and the presence of other materials or coatings on the metal's surface. These factors can all impact how the waves interact with the metal and whether they are reflected or absorbed.

Similar threads

  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
993
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top