Floating Cork Ball - Charge Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bailey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Floating
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the charge of a cork ball (mass 5.20 g) placed between two charged plates with surface charge densities of +0.22E-06 C/m² and -0.06E-06 C/m². The correct charge on the cork ball is determined to be 3.22E-06 C, achieved by applying the formula for the electric field and ensuring proper unit conversion. Initial calculations leading to an incorrect charge of 2.01E-16 C were attributed to misinterpretation of forces and unit errors. Key insights include the importance of direction in electric fields and verifying calculations for accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and forces
  • Familiarity with the concept of charge density
  • Knowledge of SI unit conversions
  • Basic principles of electrostatics, including Coulomb's law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the electric field between parallel plates
  • Learn about the implications of charge density in electrostatics
  • Explore the application of Coulomb's law in different scenarios
  • Review common mistakes in unit conversions and their impact on calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone interested in understanding charge interactions in electric fields.

Bailey
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
not sure why i keep getting it wrong....maybe caz i misunderstood some concept or something. anhyoo...here is it:

A cork ball of mass 5.20 g is placed between two very large horizontal plates. The bottom plate has a uniform charge density of +0.22E-06 C/m2, whereas the upper plate has a uniform charge density of -0.06E-06 C/m2. The cork ball, which carries an unknown charge, is placed between the plates and is observed to float motionlessly. What is the charge on the ball?


how i plan to solve it: since it give a mass, so i can find the force its acting downward due to gravity, which is "mg".

n since the ball is not moving up or down, there must be a force equal in magnitude but opposite in direction pointing upward). thus the charge of the ball should be positive.

i used E = (surface charge density) / permittivity of free space (8.85x10^-12)

then use F = qE ----> q = F/E

i ended up with 2.01E-16 C ....but its wrong.
anyone know why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
omg.lol. never mind. our prof emailed us witha hint on this question -_-"

the magnitude of the electric field = 1/2(sigma/epsilon)

epsilon = permittivity of free space.

well i ended up with 3.22x10^-6 C , which is correct. (but wasted so much time on it)
 


It seems like you have the right approach to solving this problem. However, there may be a few factors that could be causing your incorrect answer. First, make sure you are using the correct units for all of your values. It is important to convert all units to SI units (meters, kilograms, seconds, etc.) before plugging them into any equations.

Another potential issue could be the direction of your forces. Remember that the electric field points from positive to negative charges, so the direction of the force on the cork ball may be different than what you initially thought. Be sure to consider the direction of the electric field in your calculations.

Also, double check your calculations to make sure you are not making any math errors. Sometimes small mistakes in calculations can lead to significantly different answers.

If you are still having trouble, you can try approaching the problem from a different angle. Instead of using the electric field equation, you can also try using the equation for electric force, F = kq1q2/r^2, where k is the Coulomb's constant (8.99x10^9 Nm^2/C^2). Since you know the distance between the plates and the surface charge densities, you can use this equation to find the force on the cork ball and then solve for the unknown charge.

Remember to always check your work and make sure you are understanding the concepts correctly. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K