| Thread Closed |
How to become a scientist |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb11-05, 04:22 PM | #1 |
|
|
How to become a scientist
To become a scientist it takes about 10years maby more depending where you want to specialize.
At all these 10 years I will need a job to make the money for my education. If anyone is working there way up or is already, where do you or did you get your money for education. If from a job what job. Im in highschool right now grade11. Iam taking physics, chemistry, math, English this semester. Previously (relevant) courses I took are biology + prerequisites for all those. Why is physical education mandatory, its not even education you just play sports all day. And I still have to take it. And Iam lazy and just sleep on my spare time. |
| Feb11-05, 04:33 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
| Feb11-05, 04:34 PM | #3 |
|
|
being lazy is why you have to take PE. you wouldn't get any exercise without it. Take more English classes to get your spelling and grammar above a 5th grade level and start filling out forms for scholarships and grants. Look for a boring job where you can do your homework while you are sitting around (gas station cashier, security) or look for a job that reimburses you for college. There are a lot of companies out there that will do that.
|
| Feb11-05, 04:34 PM | #4 |
|
|
How to become a scientist
You dont become a scientist to make money, and if you wondering where you'll be working after your undergraduate (Bachelors) education and between grad school here is a list of places:
WalMart, Subway (Eat Fresh), Lab monkey, plumber (especially if you majored in Civil, Environmental, or Chemical engineering), bartender, DJ (especially applicable if you hold BSEE or BSME), drafter, maybe even as a junior engineer or a lab technician |
| Feb11-05, 05:14 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
| Feb11-05, 05:24 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
| Feb11-05, 05:52 PM | #7 |
|
|
What's with all this whinning on scientists not making any money. Trust me, there are lots of engineers that do ordinary desk jobs all the time. Having an engineering degree does not mean you are a good engineer. Like i said before, lots of physicists are doing "engineering"-like jobs in various fields like semi-conductors, photonics, micro-electronics. They do the interesting stuff like looking at the frontiers of material science : what are the possible applications of one type of material.To the original poster, i suggest you browse through my journal and look for the "what is a physicist"-entry (i think it is on the 3rd or 4th page). I listed some links there with official statistics on science earnings. Don't worry about money. if you are any good and you have some management-brain, you'll make lots of it... Trust me on that, been there, done that do what you are really interested in...follow your heart...marlon |
| Feb11-05, 05:54 PM | #8 |
|
|
|
| Feb11-05, 05:55 PM | #9 |
|
|
http://fastweb.monster.com/fastweb/c.../3770.ptml?ID=
and this link proves that engineers don't make as much as they like to think (generally that is) marlon |
| Feb11-05, 07:08 PM | #10 |
|
Blog Entries: 2
|
|
| Feb11-05, 07:38 PM | #11 |
|
|
marlon always misses my point.
if you are a scientist who is starting to make money, chances are you are now an engineer |
| Feb11-05, 09:36 PM | #12 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Life has many sides, and you need some skill at all of them. Mant people become mathematicians or scientists purely because they love the work, and they are content if they make enough money to spend most of their time doing the research work they love.
But this is rare, and getting more rare under an administration run by luddites like the current one. Scientists also have children, and when they start to grow up, suddenly the scientist needs to put food regularly on the table, and then also pay for the very expensive education of the budding young potential scientist in the family. In the 1960's when I was young student, Jack Kennedy was in the white house, and life was very different indeed. Corporations were encouraged to put up merit scholarship money for bright kids to go to the best schools, and places like Harvard and Princeton, began to be home to poor kids who had the ambition and talent to study hard enough to excel. Many of us went to such schools even though we could not even afford the train tickets to get there and had to hitchike back and forth. Nowadays a "merit scholarship" pays only a couple of thousand a year, as compared to more than full tuition at Harvard in the 1960's, which would translate into over $30,000 a year now. So if you want to be a scientist, you must do it because you love it, but you must also be aware that survival is important. As simple a thing as physical education is useful, since scientists sometimes work 30 or 40 hours in a row, and you cannot do that if you are physically unfit. It is also wise to have a skill that is worth money, such as computer or network savvy, so you can moonlight and actually earn something. In my job, the people with the best research track records are often barewly keeping heads above water, while those who have had less research succes but who have taught themselves computer skills, often by simply teaching the numerical analysis courses are better off. Everyone, especially poor people, needs to know how to shop wisely, cook reasonably, and maintain a car, or even a house. If you can even train a dog, you can earn extra money. You also need to learn to write clearly and persuasively, so you can communicate with others, and possibly attract grant money for your work. by the way, I hope you are joking, as there are no lazy but successful scientists. If you are interested in money and science, you might tilt toward the biological and medical sciences. Some decades ago at least it was reported that something like 51% of all federal research moneu was in those fields, while physical and mathematical sciences accounted for only 1.7%. Some university administrators evaluate research quality literally by the dollar amount of grant money attracted, so by that metric, a mediocre scientist who brings in large grants could be better regarded than a brilliant one who does not. but to be happy in your work, you have to choose it because it facinates you, not because it pays well. Still you cannot afford to let finances force you out of your field. this balancing act takes some thought and skill. By the way, education is cheap, or even free, for the truly exceptional student. Strive to be that student and professors will go out of their way to teach you, and graduate programs will pay you to attend. Well funded researchers will support you to work with them. But lazy students will not have this experience. |
| Feb11-05, 10:06 PM | #13 |
|
|
The most important thing is to work without too much stress. Find a job that can give you less stress. Otherwise, you will want to retire early.
|
| Feb11-05, 10:34 PM | #14 |
|
|
If I was truly lazy I wouldn't be trying.
I don't know what conclusions people have come up about me, heres about me: I like to play tennis, I like physics, I like joking around - who doesn't?( I live on a chair, I sit on it, eat on it, study on it, and use it for other mobile perposes )I am lazy - when I say this what I mean is to find the laziest valid solution. E.g. recently I learned about functions in math. Now I just write down a formula once. Currently I have joined a programming contest, math contest, and trying to join a biology contest, my teacher was discouraging every grade11 student from joining it to make sure there is enough room for grade12 students that want it. I found this out because one teacher came into my class and I asked for more info and thats what he said. Clearly now we may see that I am not lazy. I just say I am (lazy stupid etc...) for the fun of it. |
| Feb12-05, 01:09 PM | #15 |
|
Recognitions:
|
don't worry about our opinion of you. that seems to be all you have been concerned with. what about heeding the advice?
|
| Feb12-05, 10:06 PM | #16 |
|
|
|
| Feb13-05, 05:17 PM | #17 |
|
Recognitions:
|
just keep at it. it always takes a lot of work. writing is hard work. i went to a liberal arts college thinking i could write, and just got royally reamed on all my early work (I still remember the first comment: "Unoriginal and dull. Where are YOU in this essay?!), and even my later work. i took courses in shakespeare and "bildungsroman" and philosophy, and so on, and eventually got better. now my writing is probably ok, but it takes enormous work. i rewrite and rewrite everything that has to be good.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: How to become a scientist
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Don't Become a Scientist! | Academic Guidance | 19 | ||
| DONT BEcome A SCIENTIST | Academic Guidance | 39 | ||
| I saw an article in New Scientist...re CBR | General Astronomy | 1 | ||
| to be a scientist | General Discussion | 3 | ||
| What's the best age for a scientist? | General Discussion | 26 | ||