New Reply

Why does the physical state of a substance primarily depend on its temperature?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Oct24-12, 03:53 PM   #1
 

Why does the physical state of a substance primarily depend on its temperature?


Let me know if i am correct here. Temperature is just the amount of energy associated with that particle or molecule? So why does that determine if it is solid, liquid, or gas? Why doesnt water turn into ice at room temperature when you compress it into itself enough? Like in star wars when they are trapped in the garbage shoot and the walls are caving in (haha), but coming from every direction and squeezing a sample of water, or anything, into itself. Wouldnt the h2o particles eventually become close enough to eachother to become a solid?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> A quantum simulator for magnetic materials
>> Atomic-scale investigations solve key puzzle of LED efficiency
>> Error sought & found: State-of-the-art measurement technique optimised
Oct24-12, 04:04 PM   #2
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_diagram

it does depend on pressure as well
Oct24-12, 04:16 PM   #3
mfb
 
Mentor
Quote by lundyjb View Post
Why doesnt water turn into ice at room temperature when you compress it into itself enough?
It does. But you need a really high pressure for that.
Oct24-12, 05:03 PM   #4
 

Why does the physical state of a substance primarily depend on its temperature?


You should look at the definition of triple point and watch the video.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_point

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLRqpJN9zeA
Oct25-12, 08:43 AM   #5
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think you can compress liquid water into a solid, but just because solid water is LESS dense than liquid water. If water was "normal", you would be able to do it.
Oct25-12, 09:01 AM   #6
mfb
 
Mentor
Quote by Lsos View Post
but just because solid water is LESS dense than liquid water.
That is true at atmospheric pressure, but not for higher pressures. See the phase diagram at Wikipedia, for example.
Oct25-12, 09:11 AM   #7
 
Most solids are crystalline, with very ordered structure that represents a lowest energy configuration. It doesn't change shape because of that.
I don't think that if you could compress a liquid enough it would ever form a crystalline solid. You'd just have a very, very dense liquid that still flows.
The question is how do you define 'solid'?

Other solids are glasses, which are very viscous, slow flowing liquids. You might make something like that - but can you call it a solid?
Oct25-12, 09:16 AM   #8
 
Mentor
You can compress water into a solid. It happens just over 1 GPa at room temperature. I believe the crystalline form is tetragonal rather than the hexagonal that we are used to.
Oct25-12, 09:29 AM   #9
mfb
 
Mentor
Quote by AJ Bentley View Post
Other solids are glasses, which are very viscous, slow flowing liquids. You might make something like that - but can you call it a solid?
Glasses are solid materials. They are not liquids, which is a common misconception.
If you want long enough, every solid material with finite temperature will have some re-ordering of the atoms. But the typical timescale is so long that this is not relevant.

I don't think that if you could compress a liquid enough it would ever form a crystalline solid.
Well, it does (at least in general). You press the atoms into some dense structure.
Oct25-12, 09:48 AM   #10
 
Quote by mfb View Post
Glasses are solid materials. They are not liquids, which is a common misconception
The common misconception is the 'proof' of glazing glass flow by observation of blown glass windows, not the fact that many glass-like materials exhibit flow, particularly thermoplastics, various resins and rubbers.
The question is as to exactly when very slow movement becomes no movement.
Oct25-12, 10:59 AM   #11
 
Surely a solid has a(n attempt at) a regular crystal structure or arrangement of molecules.

Fluids and glasses do not, as do other amorphous states of matter.

Chemists and physicists also differ in their interpretation of the word 'state of matter', recognising many more than do physicists.
Oct25-12, 11:21 AM   #12
 
Mentor
I think we've answered the OP's question. Other things besides temperature matter. Pressure. Temperature history (glass vs. quartz). Pressure history (graphite vs. diamond)
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Why does the physical state of a substance primarily depend on its temperature?
Thread Forum Replies
What is temperature in non-molecule substance? Classical Physics 12
Physical Chemistry (dissolution of a substance) Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 1
does the APF depend on the temperature Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 5
How does the equation-of-state depend on the Quintessence potential? Cosmology 1
express the density of a solid substance varying with temperature Introductory Physics Homework 1