Double Integrals: Notation Question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Zurtex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the notation used in double integrals, specifically the order of integration and the presentation of differential elements. Participants explore whether the notation presented by a lecturer is standard and express varying preferences for how integrals should be written.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the standard notation of writing the integral with the differential element appearing first, suggesting it seems odd.
  • Another participant notes that expressions where the differential comes first are common and proposes a consistent notation for clarity.
  • Some participants advocate for using the first notation for clarity in complex integrals, emphasizing that it helps determine the order of integration.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the integral given the specified range for x, with one participant asserting that the integral is not possible due to the limits.
  • Another participant counters that the square roots in x would disappear after integrating with respect to y, suggesting the integral is indeed possible.
  • There is a debate about whether the integral represents an area, with some participants asserting it does not, while others dismiss the importance of what the integral represents as long as it is mathematically correct.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the first notation, suggesting it appears to imply multiplication rather than integration.
  • Discussion includes references to the theorem of iteration and its applicability to certain cases, indicating varying levels of familiarity with integration techniques among participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the standardization of notation and the validity of the integral in question. There is no consensus on the best notation or the interpretation of the integral's meaning.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific cases and examples that highlight the complexity of double integrals, indicating that the discussion is influenced by individual experiences and interpretations of notation.

Zurtex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
1
Just a question of notation here, my lecturer will wright an integral like this:

[tex]\int_3^6 dx \int_{-\sqrt{4-x^2}}^{\sqrt{4-x^2}}y \, dy[/tex]

But mean this:

[tex]\int_3^6 \int_{-\sqrt{4-x^2}}^{\sqrt{4-x^2}}y \, dy \, dx[/tex]

Is this standard notation? It seems rather odd to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I encounter expressions where the [itex]dx[/itex] or [itex]dy[/itex] comes first often as well.
[tex]\int_a^b dx f(x)[/tex]
seems to be quite customary.

To be consistent however, I'd use:
[tex]\int_3^6 dx \int_{-\sqrt{4-x^2}}^{\sqrt{4-x^2}}dy \;y[/tex]
 
Zurtex,it's highly reccomendable you use the first notation...There may be situations (like this one
[tex]\int_{0}^{3}\int_{-4}^{\pi}\int_{-5}^{9}\sin(xyz+x\sqrt{y}\sqrt[\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}]{z}) dx \ dz \ dy[/tex]

) in which you never know what integration to do first...

Daniel.
 
This integral is not possible, because the range for x is from 3 to 6, while you are integrating on a circle has the only x range (-2<x<2)

and about the notation, first is better i advice to use it always.
 
Last edited:
If I'm not mistaking,the square roots in "x" disappear afer integrating wrt "y"...So the integral is possible...:wink:

Daniel.

P.S.Nothing is wrong.
 
But it's not a logic integral on the area of that square, is it?
 
Who gives a rat's a$$ what that integral represent,as long as it is correct?
BTW,it's not an area at all...
[tex]S=\iint_{D} dx \ dy[/tex]
is the area of a plain domain from R^{2}.
That integral is something else,as u may see...:wink:

Daniel.
 
Yes, Maybe I'm wrong, hehehe,
 
dextercioby said:
Zurtex,it's highly reccomendable you use the first notation...There may be situations (like this one
[tex]\int_{0}^{3}\int_{-4}^{\pi}\int_{-5}^{9}\sin(xyz+x\sqrt{y}\sqrt[\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}]{z}) dx \ dz \ dy[/tex]

) in which you never know what integration to do first...

Daniel.
But that makes more sense to me than the first, the first just seems confusing and looks like he is multiplying them.
 
  • #10
For "nice" cases,the theorem of iteration can be applied...But in this case,there's no multiplication/iteration,just an elegant way to saying what integration is performed first...

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K