Why Thomson scattering calls for a "size-changing" electron?

by Gibby_Canes
Tags: electron, scattering, thomson scattering
Gibby_Canes is offline
Dec4-12, 09:49 PM
P: 21
From my limited understanding of Thomson scattering, it only works for wavelengths comparable to the size of the electron. Because scattering was observed at a variety of wavelengths, it was assumed that the size of the electron must change when rays of different wavelengths were scattered off of it. One of the merits of the Compton Effect was that it described this phenomenon without imposing unlikely constraints on the electron.

But I don't understand why? Why does the scattering only work for certain wavelengths? And how exactly does this transfer into the idea of an electron of variable size?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Mapping the road to quantum gravity
Chameleon crystals could enable active camouflage (w/ video)
Simon Bridge
Simon Bridge is offline
Dec4-12, 10:32 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
PF Gold
Simon Bridge's Avatar
P: 11,102
In classical optics, the scattering of a wave off a barrier depends on the size of the barrier and the incoming wavelength.
Knowing the wavelength, you should be able to work out the size of the barrier - it is a common teaching lab experiment.
The equation should work for any wavelength - it's just that the ones that are comparable to the size of the barrier give easy to measure patterns.

When you use the same model to find the "size" of an electron, you get different values depending on the wavelength of the incoming light. So it appears that different kinds of light see different sizes for the electron ... or: the classical model has a flaw in it ;)
Jano L.
Jano L. is offline
Dec7-12, 09:59 PM
P: 1,030

what you describe does not seem correct. Can you post a reference where you read it?

Thomson scattering is a term referring to scattering of X-ray radiation by (almost) free electrons; the X-rays are supposed to be comparable or lower than the size of the atoms, not electrons.

In practice, Thomson let X-rays scatter off the air molecules and calculated effective scattering cross-section for such scattering (for Poynting energy).

However, this cross-section is not connected directly with the size of the charge distribution of the electron. Point-like electron of zero radius still has non-zero Thomson cross-section



r_e = \frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0mc^2}.

In fact, the Thomson derivation is for situation where the wavelength is much greater than the electron.

The Compton effect is related, but was about something different - it shows the relation between the change in wavelength of the gamma radiation and the angle of scattering.

Neither Thomson or Compton's calculations use the idea that electron has definite non-zero size.

andrien is offline
Dec8-12, 03:21 AM
P: 987

Why Thomson scattering calls for a "size-changing" electron?

it has not to do any thing with 'size change',thomson cross-section corresponds to case when photon energy is much greate than binding energy of atom.so that you can treat the electron as free.see here page 63

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Get any calls from "cardholder services"? General Discussion 18
This is what FEMA calls "Insufficient Damage" Current Events 16
My teacher told me he calls this a "baseball question"... why?! Introductory Physics Homework 10
Do protons also exist as "proton waves" similar to the "electron waves"? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 8
j j thomson's "previous" experiment Introductory Physics Homework 2