Question about weak convergence in Hilbert space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The theorem discussed confirms that if a sequence of real functions \(X_m\) in \(L^2(A)\) converges weakly to \(X\) and the sequence of their squares \((X_m)^2\) converges weakly to \(Y\) in \(L^2(A)\), then \(Y\) equals \(X^2\). This result is established through the properties of weak convergence and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, leading to the conclusion that the Sobolev Embedding Theorem holds true in this context. The proof involves bounding integrals and applying weak convergence definitions effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weak convergence in \(L^2(A)\)
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
  • Knowledge of Sobolev spaces and embedding theorems
  • Basic concepts of functional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Sobolev Embedding Theorem in detail
  • Learn about weak convergence properties in functional analysis
  • Explore applications of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in proofs
  • Investigate further examples of weak convergence in \(L^p\) spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in functional analysis, graduate students studying real analysis, and researchers interested in the properties of weak convergence in Hilbert spaces.

Sardin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The Question is as follows:

let A be a bounded domain in R^n and
Xm a series of real functions in L^2 (A).
if Xm converge weakly to X in L^2(A)
and (Xm)^2 converge weakly to Y in L^2(A)
then Y=X^2.

i don't know if the above theorem is true and could sure use any help i can get.
if anyone has any proof please post it... thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I am not experienced in these matters, this proof should be checked for errors by one of the mentors.

For starters, I will remind everyone what the definition of weak convergence in [tex]L^{2}(A)[/tex] is:

A sequence [tex]{X_{n}}[/tex] is said to converge weakly to [tex]X[/tex] (written [tex]X_{n} \stackrel{w}{\rightarrow} X[/tex]) if for all functions [tex]Z[/tex] in [tex]L^{2}(A)[/tex], we have [tex]\int X_{n}Z \rightarrow \int XZ[/tex]

Next, I will show that if a sequence [tex]{X_{n}}[/tex] in [tex]L^{2}(A)[/tex] converges weakly, then the sequence of integrals [tex]|\int X_{n}|[/tex] is bounded. Just let [tex]Z[/tex] be the constant function [tex]Z(x) = 1[/tex]. Then by the definition of weak convergence,

[tex]\int X_{n} = \int X_{n}Z \rightarrow \int XZ = \int X[/tex]

and [tex]\int X_{n}[/tex] convergent means [tex]|\int X_{n}|[/tex] is bounded.

Next, I will point out that there is a theorem that says that two functions [tex]X[/tex] and [tex]Y[/tex] in [tex]L^{2}(A)[/tex] are equal if for all [tex]Z[/tex] in [tex]L^{2}(A)[/tex] we have

[tex]\int XZ = \int YZ[/tex]

Finally, I get to the proof.

Let [tex]M[/tex] be the bound on [tex]|\int X_{n}|[/tex]. Let [tex]L = |\int X|[/tex]. Let [tex]Z[/tex] be in [tex]L^{2}(A)[/tex], and choose [tex]\epsilon > 0[/tex].

Since [tex]{X_{n}} \stackrel{w}{\rightarrow} X[/tex], we can find [tex]N_{1}[/tex] such that for all [tex]n \ge N_{1}[/tex] we have [tex]|\int X_{n}Z - \int XZ| < \frac{\epsilon}{3L}[/tex].

Also, we can find [tex]N_{2}[/tex] such that for all [tex]n \ge N_{2}[/tex] we have [tex]|\int X_{n}Z - \int XZ| < \frac{\epsilon}{3M}[/tex].

Since [tex]{X_{n}^2} \stackrel {w}{\rightarrow} Y[/tex] we can find [tex]N_{3}[/tex] such that for all [tex]n \ge N_{3}[/tex] we have [tex]|\int X_{n}^{2}Z - \int YZ| < \frac{\epsilon}{3}[/tex].

Let [tex]N[/tex] be the maximum of [tex]N_{1}[/tex], [tex]N_{2}[/tex], and [tex]N_{3}[/tex], then for all [tex]n > N[/tex] we have

[tex]|\int X^{2}Z - \int YZ|[/tex]
[tex]\le |\int X^{2}Z - \int X_{n}XZ| + |\int X_{n}XZ - \int X_{n}^{2}Z| + |\int X_{n}^{2}Z - \int YZ|[/tex]
[tex]\le |\int X||\int XZ - \int X_{n}Z| + |\int X_{n}||\int XZ - \int X_{n}Z| + |\int X_{n}^{2}Z - \int YZ|[/tex]
[tex]< L\frac{\epsilon}{3L} + M\frac{\epsilon}{3M} + \frac{\epsilon}{3} = \epsilon[/tex]

So, [tex]X^{2} = Y[/tex]

Q.E.D.
 
Last edited:


The above theorem is indeed true and is known as the "Sobolev Embedding Theorem". It states that if a sequence of functions in a bounded domain A converges weakly in L^2(A) and the square of the sequence converges weakly in L^2(A), then the square of the limit function is equal to the limit of the squares. This can be proven using the properties of weak convergence and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

To start, we can rewrite the weak convergence conditions as follows:

∫A Xmφ dx → ∫A Xφ dx for all φ ∈ L^2(A)
∫A (Xm)^2φ dx → ∫A Yφ dx for all φ ∈ L^2(A)

where φ is a test function. Now, we can use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to obtain:

|∫A (Xm)^2φ dx| ≤ ||(Xm)^2||_2 ||φ||_2

where ||·||_2 denotes the L^2 norm. Similarly, we can write:

|∫A X^2φ dx| ≤ ||X^2||_2 ||φ||_2 = ||X||_2^2 ||φ||_2^2

Since Xm converges weakly to X in L^2(A), we have ||Xm||_2 → ||X||_2. Therefore, ||Xm||_2^2 → ||X||_2^2. Similarly, ||(Xm)^2||_2 → ||X^2||_2. This means that the right-hand side of the first inequality goes to the right-hand side of the second inequality as m → ∞.

Now, since we have shown that the right-hand side of the first inequality goes to the right-hand side of the second inequality, and that the left-hand side of the first inequality is bounded, it follows that the left-hand side of the second inequality is also bounded. This means that Y ∈ L^2(A) and we can apply the weak convergence condition to obtain:

∫A Yφ dx = ∫A (Xm)^2φ dx → ∫A X^2φ dx

for all φ ∈ L^2(A). This proves that Y = X^2.

I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K