Planning a Viking Funeral for a Friend in Manchester

  • Thread starter Thread starter brewnog
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and legality of planning a Viking-style funeral for a friend in Manchester, specifically involving the burning of a corpse on a boat in the Manchester Ship Canal. Participants explore cultural, legal, and historical aspects of such a funeral, including comparisons to traditional Viking practices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the legality of a Viking-style funeral in the UK, citing potential legal issues such as permits, health regulations, and environmental concerns.
  • Another suggests that recreating a longboat as a cultural project might be a way to circumvent legal issues, although this raises questions about the treatment of the body.
  • Several participants discuss the appropriateness of using the Manchester Ship Canal versus the Mersey for the funeral, with some humorously noting that no one would notice the event on the Mersey.
  • A participant with knowledge of fluid mechanics expresses concern about the design and safety of the boat for the funeral.
  • There is a debate about the historical accuracy of Viking funerals, with some participants noting that traditional Viking practices did not typically involve burning bodies on longboats, referencing archaeological findings and historical texts.
  • Another participant mentions that while Anglo-Saxons practiced cremation, the use of longboats as pyres among Vikings is not well-documented.
  • Discussion includes references to specific ships like the Oseberg and Gokstad ships, with differing opinions on their use in burial practices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the legality and historical accuracy of the proposed Viking funeral, with no consensus reached on the appropriateness of the practice or the specifics of Viking burial customs.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of clear historical evidence regarding the use of longboats for cremation and the potential legal ramifications of conducting such a funeral in the UK.

brewnog
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,751
Reaction score
8
Does anyone know any reason why my friend should not be able to have a Viking style funeral, where his burning corpse is sent floating down the Manchester Ship Canal in a Viking longboat (failing that, a wooden dinghy)?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Don't know what British law is like in that regard. Here, you'd need permits up the wazoo. If you just went ahead and did it, they'd get you for performing an indignity to a corpse, improper disposal of a corpse, fire regulation violations, probably some health board issues unless you can prove that nothing of him remains in circulation, water pollution and/or littering, and probably air pollution from the combustion. I would recommend making a big deal out of recreating a longboat as some sort of cultural history project, pull your plan off very quickly, and report it as an accidental fire (too late for the fire department, of course). The problem then would be, what if someone wants to know what happened to the body. I know that there is a minimum required temperature for a legal crematorium (around 1,500 degrees C., I think). Would he be satisfied with a legal cremation and having his ashes carried, perhaps in a torch, down the river?
 
Why not the Mersey?
 
Why not the Mersey?

lol your right..not a soul would notice.
 
brewnog said:
Does anyone know any reason why my friend should not be able to have a Viking style funeral, where his burning corpse is sent floating down the Manchester Ship Canal in a Viking longboat (failing that, a wooden dinghy)?
Eeh, what sort of Viking funeral is this supposed to be?
They sure didn't do anything like this here in Norway..
 
Astronuc said:
Why not the Mersey?

The bit he wants to be dropped in is the confluence of the Ship Canal and the Mersey.

arildno said:
Eeh, what sort of Viking funeral is this supposed to be?
They sure didn't do anything like this here in Norway..

Fantastic, a resident Viking. Perhaps you'd be willing to advise on longboat design?
 
brewnog said:
Fantastic, a resident Viking. Perhaps you'd be willing to advise on longboat design?
Hey, I did study fluid mechanics, but don't ever make the mistake of letting me design or (god forbid!) steer a boat, if you're planning to make a trip in that boat.
I'm just saying this out of concern for your own welfare.
 
Hey, Brewnog, check this out in the neighborhood - http://www.jorvik-viking-centre.co.uk/getinvolved/festival.htm

They even burned a viking longboat. :biggrin:
http://www.cybaea.com/pictures/pcd2742/JVF14-28.91.2.jpg


arildno - maybe this is a british viking thing. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, the ship burial mounds we've excavated in Norway shows no sign of burnt timbers, or that the bodies were burnt (at least, I never learned that tid-bit in school)
Nor can I recall any source material, like Snorri or Icelandic sagas which mention making a pyre out of a long-boat.

But, as I write this, I seem to recall that this custom was present among Saxons; I wonder if the body in the Sutton Hoo find was burnt?.
 
  • #10
Here is a link to ancient burial customs I found:
http://tanwayour.calafia.org/burial.html

It seems that Anglo-Saxons were keen on the cremation business, but, somewhat surprising to me, the ancient norse cremation technique seems to have persisted into the Viking era (I've always thought the cremation in Scandinavia ended sometime 400-600 AD, but evidently, I'm wrong here).
I only scanned the article, but couldn't find a direct quote supporting the use of longboats as a pyre among Vikings.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
IIRC, it was the 'viking' burial was used for chieftains or the highest warriors.

And I do not think a long boat was used, unless it had been damaged (as in battle) beyond reasonable repair.

I think they would have used smaller boats (like a dingy). I cannot imagine anyone trashing a longboat, as they were too valuable.

It seems that Anglo-Saxons were keen on the cremation business,
See what contact with the Brits did! :biggrin:
 
  • #12
Actually, the Oseberg ship was most probably a ceremonial ship which never did any raids.
It may well have been specifically built during the Asa-queen's reign to be her burial ship.

The Gokstad ship was a typical raiding ship in its design ; a veteran who had made his fortune on the seas might well want to be buried in his old "flagship", which at the time of his death would have required such a major overhaul in order to be sea-worthy again that the next generation would rather spend their money on a brand new ship, instead of re-fitting their Daddy's old ship.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
arildno said:
The Gokstad ship was a typical raiding ship in its design ; a veteran who had made his fortune on the seas might well want to be buried in his old "flagship", which at the time of his death would have required such a major overhaul in order to be sea-worthy again that the next generation would rather spend their money on a brand new ship, rather than their Daddy's old ship.
Good point. Presumably it is the leader/captain of the ship. His crew would get the normal burial.

Great link by the way on the burial customs.

I definitely want to be cremated in the end.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
5K