Mortgage backed securities


by Iforgot
Tags: backed, mortgage, securities
Iforgot
Iforgot is offline
#1
Apr7-13, 09:26 PM
P: 101
This link really ticked me off

http://beta.fool.com/equityfinancial...gyholnk0000001

You think we would have learned the lesson the last crash around....
Phys.Org News Partner Social sciences news on Phys.org
Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed
Newlyweds, be careful what you wish for
Can new understanding avert tragedy?
Greg Bernhardt
Greg Bernhardt is offline
#2
Apr7-13, 09:45 PM
Admin
Greg Bernhardt's Avatar
P: 8,536
Quote Quote by Iforgot View Post
This link really ticked me off
Why did it upset you? Can you explain?
Iforgot
Iforgot is offline
#3
Apr7-13, 10:25 PM
P: 101
Poor regulation of MBS are what caused the 2008 crash. The article didn't mention that at all, or what has been done to rectify the underlying issue. He mentions book value?! Guffaw! Who decides how much the underlying real estate is worth? The Fed with their 40 bil MBS purchasing?

I'm no finance dude, but that bozo, Adnan Khan, who wrote that article doesn't mention any of the risks or greater politics involved. I feel he's actively trying to mislead people who don't know any better.

He is an individual blogger, but Motley has a reputation to uphold.

What are your thoughts Greg?
(And what happened to the job posting section? My physics postdoc is finishing up soon and I'm about to start looking)

russ_watters
russ_watters is online now
#4
Apr7-13, 11:27 PM
Mentor
P: 22,001

Mortgage backed securities


Quote Quote by Iforgot View Post
Poor regulation of MBS are what caused the 2008 crash. The article didn't mention that at all, or what has been done to rectify the underlying issue.
True, but they've been around for 45 years and it is only because of some changes to them 10 years ago that there were problems. So that doesn't automatically mean that this is a bad investment.
He mentions book value?! Guffaw! Who decides how much the underlying real estate is worth?
Book value is what is written on the mortgage documents. It may as well be set in stone. I'm not clear on what your complaint is with that. Are you thinking that because real estate can vary with markets that that makes the value variable? If so, you misunderstand: a mortgage is a contract with a fixed value, not fixed to the value of the property it is associated with.
I'm no finance dude, but that bozo, Adnan Khan, who wrote that article doesn't mention any of the risks or greater politics involved. I feel he's actively trying to mislead people who don't know any better.
It appears to me that it is strictly factual and that you may be reading something into it that isn't there or responding to an emotion/bias.
OmCheeto
OmCheeto is offline
#5
Apr7-13, 11:30 PM
PF Gold
OmCheeto's Avatar
P: 1,370
The headline does make you wonder:

Undervalued Financial Stock Yielding 14%
How can a financial company "with a large chunk of its portfolio" based on 30 year mortgages pay 14% when mortgage rates are around 4%?

I have heard of companies paying good dividends to attract people's money.
I had a friend who had his life savings in Citigroup.
He said he loved them because they paid great dividends.
He committed suicide a while back.
His name was Greg, coincidentally.
He wasn't quite my age, but pretty close.
I could tell he was getting tired.
Let's see, he had about $200,000 invested, making $8000 a year in dividends.
Which turned into $15,000, making about $.50 a year in dividends.

Wow. That's kind of depressing.

Do you really think there are people that haven't been paying attention?
Iforgot
Iforgot is offline
#6
Apr8-13, 05:32 AM
P: 101
How can a financial company "with a large chunk of its portfolio" based on 30 year mortgages pay 14% when mortgage rates are around 4%?

by borrowing at a lower rate to invest in the business. I.e. leveraging. Which means they're even more susceptible to market fluctuations. If something like a margin call happens, they're wiped out.

And yes I'm emotional about this!! Any who claims they aren't is either a liar, a sociopath, or has some form of autism.....
BWV
BWV is offline
#7
Apr8-13, 05:10 PM
P: 328
before mortgage backed securities were issued in 1968, every small bank in america was a leveraged pool of mortgages. Why is the fact that a few publicly traded companies have leveraged themselves to invest in mortgage a serious problem?
russ_watters
russ_watters is online now
#8
Apr8-13, 05:39 PM
Mentor
P: 22,001
Quote Quote by OmCheeto View Post
The headline does make you wonder:


How can a financial company "with a large chunk of its portfolio" based on 30 year mortgages pay 14% when mortgage rates are around 4%?
I'm reasonably certain the complexity enables you to get around that. The way I understand it is that it is a bet on a bet, so you are betting on just the gain/loss not on the entire principal.
russ_watters
russ_watters is online now
#9
Apr8-13, 05:41 PM
Mentor
P: 22,001
Quote Quote by BWV View Post
before mortgage backed securities were issued in 1968, every small bank in america was a leveraged pool of mortgages. Why is the fact that a few publicly traded companies have leveraged themselves to invest in mortgage a serious problem?
1. Government policy changes in the 1990s drove the quality of the mortgages down.
2. Government deregulation of the investments/banks in the 1990s allowed banks to be their own investment companies and "independent" rating agencies, which hid the fact that the quality had gone down.
BWV
BWV is offline
#10
Apr9-13, 10:20 AM
P: 328
Quote Quote by russ_watters View Post
1. Government policy changes in the 1990s drove the quality of the mortgages down.
2. Government deregulation of the investments/banks in the 1990s allowed banks to be their own investment companies and "independent" rating agencies, which hid the fact that the quality had gone down.
the mortgage REITs like NLY hold agency (conforming) mortgages, not subprime or alt-A - just like S&Ls used to
BWV
BWV is offline
#11
Apr9-13, 10:23 AM
P: 328
Quote Quote by russ_watters View Post
I'm reasonably certain the complexity enables you to get around that. The way I understand it is that it is a bet on a bet, so you are betting on just the gain/loss not on the entire principal.
no, most mortgage REITs simply leverage agency pass-throughs. NLY, for example, is levered 8-1 (which is below the 12-1 regulatory capital requirements for commercial banks)
HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#12
Apr10-13, 07:28 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,885
I recently sold a house, getting several offers at the same time. The highest offer, that I did NOT accept, was dependent on the buyer getting a mortgage for 98% of the purchase price with a 2% down payment. No, apparently we haven't learned anything!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Math models of mortgage backed securities? General Math 0
Securities prices follow a log-normal distribution - a winning trading system? Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 0
If i apply for a clerk in the securities companies, will i get promoted to a trader? Career Guidance 1
USA-backed Iraq government a shining beacon of... err... Current Events 9
Ukraine - Yushchenko Reveals Why Israel Backed Him - BBC News Current Events 2