How can I prove that 34n+2 + 26n+3 is divisible by 17 using induction?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter devious_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the expression \(34n+2 + 26n+3\) is divisible by 17 using mathematical induction. Participants explore both inductive and non-inductive approaches to the proof, examining the validity of their methods and the correctness of their factorizations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an attempt at an inductive proof but struggles to show that \(f(k+1) - f(k) = 17m\).
  • Another participant asserts that the initial proof is incorrect due to a mistake in factoring.
  • A later reply questions whether the induction-free proof was also incorrect, prompting clarification on the factorization used.
  • Participants discuss the correct form of the factorization for sums of powers, with some confusion about the conditions under which certain factorizations apply.
  • One participant suggests that if \(n\) is odd, the factorization used in the original proof could be modified to make it correct.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the initial proof or the factorization methods discussed. Multiple competing views on the validity of the approaches remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the values of \(n\) and the applicability of certain algebraic identities. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of conditions under which specific mathematical statements hold.

devious_
Messages
312
Reaction score
3
I was asked to prove, using induction, that 34n+2 + 26n+3 is divisible by 17. I tried to do it, but I couldn't get anywhere. Can someone give me a push in the right direction?

Here's my attempt:
f(k) = 34k+2 + 26k+3
f(k+1) = 34k+6 + 26k+9
And now, all I have to do is prove that f(k+1) - f(k) = 17m, but I couldn't do it.


I don't really see why induction is necessary anyway. Here's my induction-free attempt:

[tex]3^{4n+2} + 2^{6n+3} = 9^{2n+1} + 8^{2n+1} = (9+8) \sum^{2k+1}_{n=1} 9^{2k+1-n} \; 8^{n-1} = 17m[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your proof is incorrect - the factoring is wrong.

Proof of theorem: f(k+1)=81*34k+2+64*26k+3
=17*34k+2+64*f(k), where both terms in the sum are divisible by 17. You need also f(0)=17 to start with.
 
Thanks.

By the way, did you mean that my induction-free proof was wrong?
 
Yes: 92n+1+82n+1 does not factor as you wrote it. You confused it with an expression with a minus sign.
 
Ah yes, it's:
a^n + b^n = (a+b)[a^(n-1) - a^(n-2)b + ... + b^(n-1)], correct?
 
You mean like a^2+ b^2= (a+ b)(a-b )?

Oops, I guess it's not correct.
 
Nope,it the REALS,you can't factor [tex]a^{n}+b^{n}[/tex]...

Daniel.
 
Well, if n is odd you can, and his newest attempt at a factorization is correct. This makes his original proof right, with a small modification.

[tex]n \in \mathbb{N} \Longrightarrow 3^{4n+2} + 2^{6n+3} = 9^{2n+1} + 8^{2n+1} = 17\sum_{k=0}^{2n}(-1)^{k} \ 9^k \ 8^{2n-k}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K