Why does the Lorentz transformation only affect the x axis?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Lorentz transformation and its relationship to the Galilean transformation, particularly focusing on why these transformations primarily affect the x-axis. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the implications of velocity affecting only the x component and seeks clarification on the setup of these transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the reasoning behind the Lorentz transformation's focus on the x-axis, questioning whether it assumes transformations of coordinates for objects moving only along that axis. Other participants confirm this interpretation and suggest further resources for understanding.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of the transformations and discussing how they relate to simulations of objects moving at relativistic speeds. Some guidance has been offered regarding additional resources to consider, but there is no explicit consensus on the original poster's understanding.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of formal education in matrices, which may influence their understanding of the transformations discussed. There is also mention of the need to account for visual effects when simulating objects moving at high speeds.

binarybob0001
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I am now studying the Lorentz transformation which shares some commonality with the Galiliean transformation. What I'm confused about is how they only seem to transform the x axis. It will help if I write it out. The Galilean transformation looks like:
[tex]x' = x-vt[/tex]
[tex]y' = y[/tex]
[tex]z' = z[/tex]
[tex]t' = t[/tex]
Although most of the books I have read do not bother, I will put this in matrix form because I will eventually do that with the Lorentz transformation.
[tex] \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 & -v &<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 &<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 &<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 <br /> \end{array} \right)<br /> \letf(\begin{array}{c}<br /> x &<br /> y &<br /> z &<br /> t <br /> \end{array} \right) =<br /> \letf(\begin{array}{c}<br /> x' &<br /> y' &<br /> z' &<br /> t'<br /> \end{array} \right)[/tex]
Pay no attention to the strange layout of the 1 by 4 arrays. I could not figure out how to make them. It is clear that veolocity effects only the x component of the resulting vector. To me that makes no sense. Does anyone know why it is set up this way. I have had no classes on matrices but I work with computer graphics programming and have taught myself much over the summer. I am thinking the book is assuming I also transform the coordinates of the object so that it is traveling only with respect to x and then transform the coordinate space back to the orginal for the final transformation. In that case giving the Lorentz transformation as first listed is not adaquate. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks, I figured out what I needed to do based what was said before. I wanted to know how I simulate a view of a rocket moving at near the speed of light. This would all depend on the way you were looking and how much forshortning the rocket had in its direction of velocity. Although I haven't figured out how to keep track of the rockets displacement using matrices at the moment, I'm sure I'll get there.
 
binarybob0001 said:
I wanted to know how I simulate a view of a rocket moving at near the speed of light.

Note that if you want to simulate what the rocket actually looks like to the eye of an observer located at a particular point, you need to take into account the fact that light from different parts of the rocket takes different amounts of time to reach the observer's eye. For a start, see

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/penrose.html

then do a Google search on "Terrell rotation" and "Terrell effect" and you'll turn up some more information.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K