| Thread Closed |
silly question about pull-ups |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Oct8-03, 12:14 AM | #1 |
|
|
silly question about pull-ups
When it comes to doing pull-ups (or chin-ups) does difficulty depend on where the individual's center of mass is? Someone I know contends that pull-ups are more difficult for females because they have lower centers of mass. It seems to me though that center of mass shouldn't matter for this particular exercise; so for instance if I moved my center of mass down 1 foot, it shouldn't make a pull-up more difficult as long as my net weight remains constant.
What say you physics knowing peoples? |
| Oct8-03, 12:27 AM | #2 |
|
|
I don't see how it would matter either. As soon as your feet are off the ground, you're a pendulum -- and your center of mass will experience a restoring torque which will push it directly under the pivot. Once the center of mass is directly under the pivot, I see no way its vertical distance could make any difference.
I'd say women have a harder time with pull-ups and chin-ups because their genetics don't encourage as much upper-body musculature. - Warren |
| Oct8-03, 01:44 AM | #3 |
|
|
yea verily.
|
| Oct8-03, 01:48 PM | #4 |
|
|
silly question about pull-ups
The point is not whether the center of mass is high or low but how much it is raised. A person with longer arms who raises his/her center of gravity more would do more work.
|
| Oct8-03, 01:51 PM | #5 |
|
|
Muscle insertion plays a role, too.
|
| Oct11-03, 02:22 PM | #6 |
|
|
Halls is right,
a female with a lower center of mass has to do more work. for example consider a boy and a girl of 75 kilograms the distance to the boys center of mass from his vertically outstretched arms is .5 meters, and the distance to the girls is .5+x meters than the energy required to do a pull up for each of them is. Boy = 75*g*.5 Girl = 75*g*(.5 + x) = 75*g*.5 + 75*g*x meaning it takes more energy for the girl to do a pull up. |
| Oct11-03, 02:33 PM | #7 |
|
Mentor
|
And that wasn't Halls's point. His was a hypothetical - IF one person had longer arms than another of the same mass, it would take more energy. Someone tall and skinny has to work harder than someone short and fat (and the same mass). And if you want to be picky, adult males being taller on average have longer arms than adult females do. |
| Oct11-03, 02:45 PM | #8 |
|
|
Dear russ, thank you for your sarcasim(hint: your misinterpreting the problems setup)
Hall's point, and mine is not that girls have longer arms. It is that if a person is raising the point at which force is acting on them over a longer distance. than that effort requires more energy, and is thus it is harder to perform that effort. |
| Oct11-03, 03:44 PM | #9 |
|
|
|
| Oct11-03, 06:30 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
| Oct13-03, 04:55 PM | #11 |
|
|
But a female's lower center of gravity is closer to the Earth's, so it would have a stronger pull. Of course thier shorter arms would put them higher up, so maybe it evens out. But the combination of lower COG and shorter limbs gives the female a decided dissadvantage in doing squats.
|
| Oct13-03, 08:31 PM | #12 |
|
|
|
| Oct13-03, 09:18 PM | #13 |
|
Mentor
|
If you want to see some REAL sarcasm from me check the politics forum out - or that thread on expanding earth. I can be downright nasty. |
| Oct14-03, 07:35 PM | #14 |
|
|
I now see where you got the x being the arm length. I was trying to put the CoG over the bar. Something tells me that the fact that you edited that post before I saw it was a good thing.
We have a politics forum? |
| Oct15-03, 07:15 AM | #15 |
|
|
The lenght of the arm is important since doing pullups you're using the arm as a lever. However muscle is important here. There is an effect that is very important that has been overlooked in this thread so far. And that is the idea of ratios. Suppose you take a look at this only from a physics standpoint and not from a muscle efficiency etc point of view. Consider a person of a certain height and weight. His muslces have a certain cross-sectional area. Lets assume that the strength of the man is proportional to the cross-sectional area of the muscle. Now if the man doubles in size such that all his physical dimesions increase in direct proportion then the cross-sectional area of the muscle will double in size. However his weight has now increased 4-fold. So he got twice as strong but now he has to lift 4 times the weight! That tanslates to less pullups. Pmb |
| Oct23-03, 04:41 AM | #16 |
|
|
One issue that nobody's looked at is that a pull-up doesn't happen directly under the bar. It happens off to one side, especially as you finish the pull-up. That means that you're not just pulling straight up--you also have to hold your center of mass out. Since men have a higher center of mass, they have to hold it out at a greater angle. Therefore, center-of-mass alone means men do harder pull-ups.
|
| Oct24-03, 01:08 AM | #17 |
|
Mentor
|
Nice catch. I actually did think of that as I'm relatively skinny and thats a problem for me doing pullups - I start swinging back and forth. To compensate I lean back(or rather pull my legs up in front of me), but then that just means I'm lifing my COG further than if I could lift myself straight up.
Besides where your COG is located though, this is also due to muscle geometry. Your biceps lift your body up at the shoulder while your lats just pull your body forward to meet your elbow. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: silly question about pull-ups
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Gravitational Pull Question | Introductory Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| Silly question but uhh | Introductory Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| silly question.... | Calculus | 2 | ||
| Silly NMR Question | Chemistry | 3 | ||
| very silly question... | General Astronomy | 5 | ||