| Thread Closed |
Olkiluoto-3 EPR, Finland |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar31-05, 11:49 AM | #1 |
|
Admin
|
Olkiluoto-3 EPR, Finland
OL-3 Project
Plant's net electric output approx. 1600 MW Net efficiency approx. 37 % |
| Mar31-05, 02:21 PM | #2 |
|
|
Is 37% net efficiency high for reactors?
|
| Mar31-05, 02:38 PM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Yes - that's good for a reactor. Fossil fueled plants will do about 40% The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics puts limits on the efficiency of a heat engine - which the Rankine steam cycle in any power plant is. The hotter the source of heat - the more efficient the steam cycle can be. Nuclear reactor output temperatures are limited to about 650 F for a Pressurize Water Reactor [ PWR ]. The output temperature of a fossil fueled boiler is in the neighborhood of 1000 F. So fossil plants have more efficient steam cycles. The now shutdown Indian Point Unit 1, near Peekskill, NY; had an oil-fired superheater to heat the steam out of the reactor, in order to gain efficiency. High temperature gas-cooled reactors can approach the efficiencies of fossil plants. The only 2 HTGRs in the USA were Peach Bottom 1, and Fort Saint Vrain, both shutdown. The Germans were experimenting with high temperature gas cooled pebble bed reactors. Dr. Gregory Greenman Physicist |
| Mar31-05, 07:59 PM | #4 |
|
Admin
|
Olkiluoto-3 EPR, Finland
In the early 1990's Siemens introduced some advanced blade designs into their steam turbines. The blades were curve rather than straight, seals were improved to reduce by-pass, and stages were optimized. The net result is that a plant that was designed for 1450 MWe with the old turbine design (~33.5% efficient) can now produce 1600 MWe with the same thermal energy, thus realizing a 37% efficiency.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Olkiluoto-3 EPR, Finland
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| national geographic, finland, polar bears | General Discussion | 1 | ||