Maximum transmission ratio of a spur gear pair

Click For Summary
The permissible maximum transmission ratio for a spur gear pair is generally considered to be around 1:5, with ratios exceeding this suggesting the use of multi-stage reduction for efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Using a 1:6 ratio is more manageable with two stages, such as 1:2 and 1:3, which allows for smaller gear sizes. When only one tooth on each gear is engaged, the design can be optimized to reduce weight and cost, particularly in multi-stage setups. There is no physical limit to the gear ratio if weight and cost are not concerns, and there is no minimum RPM for spur gears, although backlash may become an issue at low power transmission levels. Effective strategies exist to mitigate backlash if it arises.
siddharth23
Messages
249
Reaction score
26
WHat is the permissible maximum transmission ratio of a Spur gear pair? I read somewhere that it is 1:5. What wil happen if this is exceeded?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Depending on tooth profile, if a simple spur gear has less than about 12 teeth it will obstruct. That means a 1:5 ratio requires 12:60 tooth gear wheels which will be quite large. For a 1:6 ratio it is better to use two stages with ratios of 1:2 and 1:3 which becomes 12:24 and 12:36 teeth.

There will be times when only one tooth on each gear wheel is working. Since power = torque * RPM, the faster stage gear teeth can be smaller and lighter since those teeth handle less torque more often. That can reduce the weight so when multi-stage reduction is used for more than a 1:5 ratio, the gearbox can be smaller, lighter and lower cost.

So yes, if the ratio is greater than about 1:5 you should consider multi-stage reduction for economic reasons. There is no physical ratio limit if there is no weight or cost limit.
 
Thanks! I know minimum teeth on the pinion should be 18 to avoid interference. What's the minimum RPM at which a pair of Spur gears can be used?
 
There is no minimum speed. They can stop and reverse.
There may be a backlash problem when significant power is not being transmitted.
There are ways of reducing backlash if it is a problem.
 
https://newatlas.com/technology/abenics-versatile-active-ball-joint-gear/ They say this could be used as a shoulder joint for robots. Mind boggling! I'm amazed this has been done in real life. The model they show seems impractical to me. The ball spins in place but doesn't connect to anything. I guess what they would do would be attach a shaft to that ball, then restrict the motion so the drive gears don't contact the shaft. The ball would have two limited degrees of freedom then a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K