Calculating Surface Area & Volume of 3D Function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the surface area and volume of a 3D figure defined by the function y = -z sin(xz) within specific bounds on the z-axis. Participants explore the mathematical formulation required for integration and the implications of the function's behavior in relation to the x-z plane.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant poses a question about finding the surface area and volume of the figure defined by the function y = -z sin(xz) over the interval z = a to z = b.
  • Another participant suggests that the given interval on z induces limits on x, which can be used in the Riemann version of the surface integral.
  • A proposed surface area integral is presented, but the participant expresses uncertainty about its correctness and notes the complexity of the integration.
  • Concerns are raised about the oscillatory nature of the function and its implications for the surface area calculation, particularly regarding the formula's applicability when the surface oscillates above and below the x-z plane.
  • Some participants discuss the constraints imposed by the modulus inequality on the function's behavior, suggesting it may not oscillate as initially thought.
  • One participant mentions a potential simplification of the problem by redefining the function as y = z cos(zx) and adjusting the domain accordingly, leading to a different integral for surface area.
  • Participants share their calculated surface area values, expressing uncertainty about their accuracy and discussing the need for further study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correct approach to calculating the surface area and volume, with multiple competing views and uncertainties expressed regarding the function's behavior and the integration process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding of the function's oscillatory behavior and the implications for the surface area formula. There is also mention of potential errors in the initial domain of the equation, which may affect the calculations.

bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
Area/Volume Question

Given the function on a 3D coordinate system:
[tex]y = - z\sin \left( {xz} \right)[/tex] where [tex]\left| {x - \frac{\pi }<br /> {2}} \right| \leqslant \frac{\pi }{z},\;z \ne 0[/tex]

How do find the surface area of the figure integrated from z=a to z=b (where 'a' and 'b' are constants) ?

How would you also find the volume of this figure, from z=a to z=b (well, bounded by the top and by the trough, that is :blushing: ) ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That interval on "z" induces an interval on "x" (by the modulus inequality).So you have your limits to the Riemann version of the surface integral.
U got the surface equation in explicit form

[tex]y(z,x)=-z\sin xz[/tex]

U must know the formula giving an area for a surface in [itex]\mathbb{R}^{3}[/itex] whose equation is given explicitely.

I don't promiss the integration will be easy.

Daniel.
 
Guys,

I'm not sure, but it looks like this:

[tex] \int_{z_a}^{z_b}\int_{\frac{\pi}{2}-\frac{\pi}{z}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}+\frac{\pi}{z}} \sqrt{z^4Cos^2(xz)+(zxCos(xz)+Sin(xz))^2+1}dxdz[/tex]

Can someone check this please?

Edit: The surface area I mean.
Well, I guess I should explain to you how I arrived at this but I'll need to verify it before I do and perhaps others can provide additional input in the interim period . . .
 
Last edited:
If it's really like that,then u can say good-bye from the integration.It's very elliptical...

Daniel.
 
saltydog said:
Guys,

I'm not sure, but it looks like this:

[tex] \int_{z_a}^{z_b}\int_{\frac{\pi}{2}-\frac{\pi}{z}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}+\frac{\pi}{z}} \sqrt{z^4Cos^2(xz)+(zxCos(xz)+Sin(xz))^2+1}dxdz[/tex]

Can someone check this please?

Edit: The surface area I mean.
Well, I guess I should explain to you how I arrived at this but I'll need to verify it before I do and perhaps others can provide additional input in the interim period . . .

Ok, I think I'm wrong: The function f(x,z) oscillates above and below the x-z plane. The formula I'm using above works only for a surface above the x-z plane. Requires further study . . .
 
Last edited:
Ok, I think I'm wrong: The function f(x,z) oscillates above and below the x-z plane. The formula I'm using above works only for a surface above the x-z plane. Requires further study . . .

Why does that matter? The surface area of y = f(x, z) and of y = 10^10^100 + f(x, z) is the same, gives the same formula, and the latter does not go below the x-z plane.
 
saltydog said:
The function f(x,z) oscillates above and below the x-z plane

[tex]\left| {x - \frac{\pi }{2}} \right| \leqslant \frac{\pi }{z},\;z \ne 0[/tex] constricts [tex]y(x,z)[/tex] to a half-cycle, but I don't think it will oscillate. I mean, this given interval means half-cycle is either above the xz-plane or below the xz-plane (no "oscillation" between), depending on the sign of 'z' (did that to simplify to a half-cycle)--but not on both sides (unless you widen the interval, which might, i think, make it more difficult with oscillation)
 
Last edited:
bomba923 said:
[tex]\left| {x - \frac{\pi }{2}} \right| \leqslant \frac{\pi }{z},\;z \ne 0[/tex] constricts [tex]y(x,z)[/tex] to a half-cycle, but I don't think it will oscillate. I mean, this given interval means half-cycle is either above the xz-plane or below the xz-plane (no "oscillation" between), depending on the sign of 'z' (did that to simplify to a half-cycle)--but not on both sides (unless you widen the interval, which might, i think, make it more difficult with oscillation)

Ok, thanks. I was looking at the whole plot without restricting it to the area between the lower and upper curve in z. Sooooo . . . maybe I do have it right. I'll spend some time on it and will ultimately just NIntegrate it in Mathematica and report the results. Can you report your results also?

I've included a plot of the boundary of the integration limits. I'll numerically integrate it from say z=1 to z=5 between the lower and upper curve and report the results.
 

Attachments

  • surfaceint.JPG
    surfaceint.JPG
    4.9 KB · Views: 549
Last edited:
saltydog said:
[tex] \int_{z_a}^{z_b}\int_{\frac{\pi}{2}-\frac{\pi}{z}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}+\frac{\pi}{z}} \sqrt{z^4Cos^2(xz)+(zxCos(xz)+Sin(xz))^2+1}dxdz[/tex]
I think followed your approach to solve it--find the dL (arc length) for the y-curve with respect to x (using dx), next multiply by dz to get dA, and then use a double integral to solve it. However, I'm not quire sure if my approach is correct :bugeye: ...(and thus the thread-!)

(My goal here for this problem is to find a general form (for the area And volume), given any bivariate function y(x,z) in 3D with x-interval [f(x,z), g(x,z)], integrated across from z=a to z=b. I started out here with a specific case :shy: )
 
Last edited:
  • #10
bomba923 said:
I think followed your approach to solve it--find the dL (arc length) for the y-curve with respect to x (using dx), next multiply by dz to get dA, and then use a double integral to solve it. However, I'm not sure if my approach is correct...(and thus the thread-!)

(My goal here for this problem is to find a general form, given any bivariate function y(x,z) in 3D with x-interval [f(x,z), g(x,z)], integrated across the z-axis. I started out here with a specific case :shy: )

Well, I'm just using the standard theorem for calculating surface area; it should be in your Calculus book. The one I'm looking at now is Leithold, p. 995. Anyway, I got a surface area between z=1 and z=5 of 59.135. I must tell you I'm not confident of it withoug further study of the matter however.
 
  • #11
Neither am I :shy:
I got same answer (well, first I wrote it wrong, but then I fixed it and got 59.1)
Check out the 3D graph--it looks kind of neat
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Hmm---it seems the domain of my equation was wrong from the start! In addition, (as it is a periodic function), the whole problem can actually be simplified as
[tex]y\left( {x,z} \right) = z\cos \left( {zx} \right),\left| {zx} \right| \leqslant \frac{\pi }{2}[/tex]
*And then one finds the surface area generated from z=a to z=b (across a much nicer interval)
 
Last edited:
  • #13
bomba923 said:
Hmm---it seems the domain of my equation was wrong from the start! In addition, (as it is a periodic function), the whole problem can actually be simplified as
[tex]y\left( {x,z} \right) = z\cos \left( {zx} \right),\left| {zx} \right| \leqslant \frac{\pi }{2}[/tex]
*And then one finds the surface area generated from z=a to z=b (across a much nicer interval)

Ok, in that case I get:

[tex]\int_{z_a}^{z_b}\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2z}}^{\frac{\pi}{2z}} \sqrt{z^4Cos^2(xz)+(Cos(xz)-zxSin(xz))^2+1}dxdz[/tex]

For the interval z=1 to z=5, I get 26.49.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K