Coefficient of drag of an object in water

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the coefficient of drag for objects, specifically wind turbine rotors, when submerged in water compared to their behavior in air. Participants explore the implications of drag coefficients in different fluids and the relevance of Reynolds numbers in these contexts, with a focus on small-scale applications of underwater turbines.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the lack of information on the coefficient of drag for rotating objects in water compared to air, questioning whether values from air can be applied to water.
  • Another participant suggests that the design of the turbine blades may be similar to boat outdrives and provides links to resources that could aid in design considerations.
  • There is a discussion about the Reynolds number, with one participant asserting that if the Reynolds numbers are similar, the coefficients of drag might also be similar.
  • Another participant challenges this by pointing out that Reynolds numbers for water and air are generally different, but acknowledges that they can be similar under certain conditions (e.g., different sizes and speeds).
  • A participant expresses interest in small-scale turbine applications and mentions a micro water turbine developed by a Dutch firm, indicating a desire to experiment with such technology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of drag coefficients from air to water, and there is no consensus on the relationship between Reynolds numbers in these two mediums. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific values of drag coefficients in water.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of comparing drag coefficients across different fluids, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of Reynolds numbers and the conditions under which they may be similar.

bigdummy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm working on an idea that has to do with placing wind turbines on lake beds to catch the constant undercurrents (not a wholy original idea, I know). One of the most important factors to take into consideration is the lateral force exerted on the tower by the current--which is identical to the force exerted by the wind on a wind turbine tower. The only problem is that there is a lot of information that can be found on the coefficient of drag of a spinning rotor in a gaseous fluid (air), whereas I really haven't been able to come across much information regarding the coefficient of drag of a rotor (in motion) submersed in a liquid (such as water). For example, a wind turbine has a coefficient of drag of about .9 while rotating. And the maximum value for an object (such as a parachute) in air is around 1.5. Would these values hold true for the medium of water? Is there some explanation that limits the coefficient of drag to a value of less than 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found something that may be of help to you in the design of the blades themselves. It seemed that the design you might be considering was similar to that of a boat's outdrive, so I went to one of the more popular manufacturers and found this page from http://www.mercurymarine.com/chapter_4_-_propeller_technology .

Also found another paper http://web.mit.edu/13.012/www/handouts/propellers_reading.pdf that gives equations on figuring out the different properties and other design considerations.

Out of curiosity, are you thinking large scale application, or a portable source for boaters or others near water?

Akula
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the Reynold's number is similar in two applications, then the coefficients of drag will be close.
 
In regards to the Reynold's number, aren't they totally different for water and air? And as for the question regarding the application of this information: I'm much more interested in small scale production. Sure, large-scale power generation is where all the money is, but who can do the R&D for something like that in their garage?

Sidenote: There is supposedly this Dutch firm that has come up with a micro water turbine that is small enough to fit inside of the water pipes of a home and can still generate about 1.5V. Now that's not a whole lot of power, I realize, but it's something. I'd really like to play with this thing if I could get a hold of it, but it doesn't seem to be on the market anywhere. If you have any inklings, please do inform.
 
bigdummy said:
In regards to the Reynold's number, aren't they totally different for water and air?

Yes, if everything were identical. If you're comparing things of different sizes (but identical shape) moving at different speeds, then the Reynold's number can be similar.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
21K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K