Solving f(x)=3x^2+7x=5 for m=23 and m=25 using Completing the Square

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter clueles
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the equation f(x) = 3x² + 7x - 5 for modular values m = 23 and m = 25 using the method of completing the square and quadratic reciprocity. For m = 23, it is established that there are no solutions due to the properties of quadratic residues, specifically that (6x + 7)² ≡ 109 (mod 23) results in a non-residue. In contrast, the problem for m = 25 is noted to be simpler, although specific solutions were not provided. The completion of the square method was initially applied but deemed less relevant for finding modular solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic
  • Knowledge of quadratic reciprocity
  • Experience with completing the square method
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of quadratic residues and non-residues in modular arithmetic
  • Learn about the application of quadratic reciprocity in number theory
  • Explore solving quadratic equations in modular systems
  • Investigate alternative methods for solving modular equations, such as the Chinese Remainder Theorem
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in solving modular equations and understanding quadratic properties.

clueles
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
please help me with this!

f(x)=3x^2+7x=5. find the solution of f(x)==0(mod m) for

m=23
m=25

the only thing i have done so far is completed the square
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Completing the square gives (X+7/6)^2=109/36.

Bringing the 36 to the other side gives: (6X+7)^2 =109.

For modulo 23, you should consider quadratic reciprocity. For M=25, the problem is easier.
 
Last edited:
clueles said:
f(x)=3x^2+7x=5. find the solution of f(x)==0(mod m) for

m=23
m=25

the only thing i have done so far is completed the square

I'll assume you mean [tex]f(x)=3x^2+7x-5[/tex] (that is, you're not setting it to a boolean value).

I'm not convinced that completing the square is relevant here. A quick use of quadratic reciprocity (don't worry, skip it if you haven't seen it) shows that there are no solutions modulo 23:

[tex](6x+7)^2\equiv109\equiv17\pmod{23}[/tex]

[tex]\left(\frac{17}{23}\right)=\left(\frac{23}{17}\right)=\left(\frac{6}{17}\right)=\left(\frac{2}{17}\right)\left(\frac{3}{17}\right)=\left(\frac{17}{3}\right)=\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)=-1[/tex]

This doesn't mean anything, though, just that the real solution isn't on one of the modular solutions.

Look at it this way: replacing [tex]x[/tex] with [tex]x+1[/tex] you have [tex]f(x)=3x^2+6x+1+7x+1-5=(3x^2+7x-5)+(6x+2)[/tex]. By choosing [tex]x[/tex] you should be able to cycle through all the congruence classes, since neither 23 nor 25 is divisible by 2 or 6.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K