Simple Harmonic Motion and free-fall accelerations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to simple harmonic motion, specifically focusing on the characteristics of a seconds pendulum and the comparison of free-fall accelerations at two locations: Tokyo and Cambridge. The original poster seeks assistance in determining the ratio of free-fall accelerations based on the lengths of the pendulums at these locations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the period of the pendulum and the free-fall acceleration, referencing the formula for the period of a pendulum. Some suggest expressing the ratio of free-fall accelerations in terms of the lengths of the pendulums, while others question the clarity of the approach and offer alternative methods.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different methods to compute the ratio of free-fall accelerations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of the pendulum length and period relationship, but no consensus has been reached on a single approach.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the equal periods of the pendulums at both locations, which serves as a key assumption in the problem. Participants are also navigating preferences for dealing with ratios versus direct calculations.

imnotsmart
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
A "seconds" pendulum is one that goes through its equilibrium position once each second. (The period of the pendulum is 2.000 s.) The length of a seconds pendulum is 0.9927 m at Tokyo and 0.9942 m at Cambridge, England. What is the ratio of the free-fall accelerations at these two locations?
Cambridge / Tokyo) = 1 +?

How do I work this problem? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you observe, in Cambridge the value of g is higher than in Tokyo (g_C/g_T = 1 + ?).

Knowing that the periods are equal, then:

[tex]\frac{T_C}{T_T} = 1[/tex]

or


[tex]\frac{2\pi \sqrt{\frac{l_C}{g_C}}}{2\pi \sqrt{\frac{l_T}{g_T}}} = 1[/tex]

You can go on to find g_C/g_T in terms of the ratio l_C/l_T.
 
Are you familiar with this formula?

[tex]T = 2\pi \sqrt\frac{L}{g}[/tex]

[tex]T[/tex] is the peroid, so set it equal to two and solve for the value [tex]g[/tex] with your given [tex]L[/tex] value.
 
theCandyman said:
Are you familiar with this formula?

[tex]T = 2\pi \sqrt\frac{L}{g}[/tex]

[tex]T[/tex] is the peroid, so set it equal to two and solve for the value [tex]g[/tex] with your given [tex]L[/tex] value.

It is neater to express the ratio of free fall accelerations in terms of the ratio of the 1-sec pendulum lengths, than finding the free fall acceleration in each location and then computing the ratio.

Indeed the conclusion will be that:

[tex]\frac{g_C}{g_T} = \frac{l_C}{l_T} = \frac{0.9942}{0.9927} = 1 + 1.51 * 10^{-3}[/tex]
 
Yes, yours is a much better way to compute it. I dislike dealing with ratios through out a whole problem so I attempted it a different way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
11K