How to we do the inverse of y=(x-1)^2 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse of the function y = (x-1)^2, with participants exploring the concept of function inverses and the conditions required for a function to have an inverse.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to switch variables and manipulate the equation to find the inverse. Questions arise regarding the nature of functions and their inverses, particularly in relation to bijectivity and the implications of non-function scenarios.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on the requirements for a function to have an inverse. Some guidance is provided regarding the need for bijective properties, but there is no explicit consensus on the original problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of specific homework constraints, such as the requirement to express the inverse in terms of y, and the exploration of non-function cases like x=2, which complicates the discussion.

cmab
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
How to we do the inverse of y=(x-1)^2 ?

Would it be x = sqrt(y) +1 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's see.

[tex]y = (x-1)^2[/tex]

Now switching x and y we get

[tex]x = (y-1)^2[/tex]
[tex]\sqrt{x} = y - 1[/tex]
[tex]y = \sqrt{x} + 1[/tex]

When you find inverses, you usually want to put the inverse in terms of the given variable if possible. Sometimes you'll see, it is quite impossible.

Example: Find the inverse of [tex]y = x^3-x[/tex]

Jameson
 
but in my problem, it must have respect to y...

How about the reciprocal of x=2, would it be y=2 ? Just swapping the variable.
 


The issue with finding the inverse of x=2 is that x=2 isn't a function. A function is an ordered tuple from one set to another. x=2 only refers to an one element of one set. Furthermore, if you want your function to have an inverse the rule has to have other requirements. It has to be bijective, which means it has to be both injective and surjective. Hence [tex]y = x^3-x[/tex]
has no inverse since solving for x gives multiple functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
966
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K