Thread Closed

Mills Method of Inductive Inference

 
Share Thread
Jun1-05, 04:31 PM   #1
 

Mills Method of Inductive Inference


Hello all. I am having trouble with this one assignment. I'm trying to figure out which one of Mill's method of inductive inference belongs to this passage.

Some theories arise from anecdotal evidence that is difficult to confirm. In The Left-Hander Syndrome (1992), Stanley Coren sought to evaluate the common belief that left-handed persons die sooner than right-handers. But death certificates or other public records very rarely mention the hand preferred by the deceased. What could serve as a reliable data source with which that hypothesis could be tested? Coren searched baseball records, noting which hand baseball pitchers threw with, and then recording their ages at death. Right-handed pitchers, he found, lived on average nine months longer than lefties. Then, in a follow-up study, he and a colleague telephoned the relatives of people named on death certificates in two California counties, to ask which hand the deceased favored. Right-handed people (that study found) lived an average of nine years longer than lefties.

For this, the method I chose was: The Method of Concomitant Variation. If there is anyone that can help out, I would surely appreciate the help. Thank you in advance.

KJ
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Jun1-05, 04:38 PM   #2
 
Concomitant Variation sounds right to me.
Jun1-05, 07:01 PM   #3
 
So does it sound right or do you really know if its right? How did you come up with that? I just want to be 100% sure. Thanks for the fast response also.
Jun1-05, 09:04 PM   #4
 

Mills Method of Inductive Inference


Actually that is a tough call, I would go with concomitant variation after reading it again.

If the phenomenon being studied varies either directly or inversely with exactly one of a number of possible sources, then it is the cause.
It can't be agreement or difference since there is only one presented piece of data. The joint method also doesnt fit the provided data. I would say is concomitant variation because within the baseball group there was a nine month difference in age of death, whereas in the largest group there was a nine year difference.
Jun2-05, 07:25 AM   #5
 
O.K. Thank you. That is what I thought also. I think I will stick with that answer. Appreciate the assistance.
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: Mills Method of Inductive Inference
Thread Forum Replies
Bayesian Inference Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 2
Rule of Inference Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 15
Bayes net inference Programming & Comp Sci 0
An Empirical Inductive Method . . . Applied to a Panpsychism Model of Consciousness General Discussion 121
Statistical 'Inference' Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 2