Mills Method of Inductive Inference

  • Thread starter Thread starter kennethj67
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying Mill's method of inductive inference as it applies to a passage concerning the relationship between handedness and lifespan, based on anecdotal evidence and studies conducted by Stanley Coren.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the appropriateness of the Method of Concomitant Variation in relation to the provided data, questioning the reasoning behind this choice and seeking confirmation of its validity.

Discussion Status

Some participants express agreement with the choice of concomitant variation, while others seek further clarification and justification for this method. The discussion reflects a mix of confidence and uncertainty regarding the application of the method to the scenario presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of applying Mill's methods to a specific case study, with emphasis on the limitations of the data available and the implications of the findings discussed.

kennethj67
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I am having trouble with this one assignment. I'm trying to figure out which one of Mill's method of inductive inference belongs to this passage.

Some theories arise from anecdotal evidence that is difficult to confirm. In The Left-Hander Syndrome (1992), Stanley Coren sought to evaluate the common belief that left-handed persons die sooner than right-handers. But death certificates or other public records very rarely mention the hand preferred by the deceased. What could serve as a reliable data source with which that hypothesis could be tested? Coren searched baseball records, noting which hand baseball pitchers threw with, and then recording their ages at death. Right-handed pitchers, he found, lived on average nine months longer than lefties. Then, in a follow-up study, he and a colleague telephoned the relatives of people named on death certificates in two California counties, to ask which hand the deceased favored. Right-handed people (that study found) lived an average of nine years longer than lefties.

For this, the method I chose was: The Method of Concomitant Variation. If there is anyone that can help out, I would surely appreciate the help. Thank you in advance.

KJ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Concomitant Variation sounds right to me.
 
So does it sound right or do you really know if its right? How did you come up with that? I just want to be 100% sure. Thanks for the fast response also.
 
Actually that is a tough call, I would go with concomitant variation after reading it again.

If the phenomenon being studied varies either directly or inversely with exactly one of a number of possible sources, then it is the cause.

It can't be agreement or difference since there is only one presented piece of data. The joint method also doesn't fit the provided data. I would say is concomitant variation because within the baseball group there was a nine month difference in age of death, whereas in the largest group there was a nine year difference.
 
Last edited:
O.K. Thank you. That is what I thought also. I think I will stick with that answer. Appreciate the assistance.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
121
Views
23K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K