Understanding Limits to Solving Two Common Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter DieCommie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding limits in calculus, specifically addressing two limit problems presented by the original poster. The first problem involves the behavior of a limit as the denominator approaches zero while the numerator remains non-zero. The second problem concerns evaluating a limit as x approaches infinity for a rational expression involving a square root.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions under which limits exist, particularly focusing on cases where the denominator approaches zero. Questions arise about the implications of limits involving infinity and the correct application of limit laws. There is also discussion about factoring expressions to simplify limits, especially in the context of infinity.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problems, offering insights and clarifications regarding the limits. Some guidance has been provided on how to approach the factoring of expressions, and there is an ongoing examination of the assumptions related to the existence of limits. Multiple interpretations of the limit behavior are being explored without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints mentioned regarding the original poster's class homework, including the teacher's refusal to provide answers for even-numbered questions. This context may influence the discussion and the participants' willingness to assist.

DieCommie
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with a couple of limit concepts in my class homework. For some reason my teacher says he won't help us or tell us the answer to the even questions, and he is not collecting them for homework either.:confused: He says your on your own with those questions, so i hope you can help me.

First, my book says that a limit doesn't exist when the denominator tends to zero, but the numerator dosent. The answer i got was the numerator tends to 18 while the denominator tends to 0 and i thought this was infinity... Why is this not infinity? :confused:

Second, lim as x->inf. of (ax/(sqr.root. of (x^2+ax) + x)) I am thinking that I need to factor out an x, but I am not sure how to do this or if this is even what i should do...

Thx for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably because

[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{-}} f(x) \neq \lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{+}} f(x)[/tex]

A classic example is

[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{-}} \frac{1}{x} = - \infty[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{1}{x} = + \infty[/tex]

Therefore [itex]\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{x}[/itex] does not exist.

Now,

[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{ax}{\sqrt{x^2+ax + x}}[/tex]

rewrite it as

[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{ax}{x \sqrt{1 + \frac{a}{x} + \frac{1}{x}}}[/tex]
 
A number infinitely small (as close to zero without being zero) would give you infinity. However, this limit can specifically reach zero. But a number divided by zero doesn't have a solution. The limit of any fraction where the denominator = 0 (watch out for cases when you can factor out something to get rid of this) is not going to exist.

For the second part. Yes, you do need to factor out an x...but a little more. Focus on what is in the square root. You have [tex]x^2 + ax[/tex]. Just because the smallest degree of x is 1, it doesn't mean you can't factor out more. Try factoring out an [tex]x^2[/tex] and continue on.
 
Thx, that helps... but perhaps i should be more specific about the first part.

First it is given that lim x->+inf. of f(x)= 3 and of g(x)=-5

then i find the limit x->+inf. of 6f(x)/(5f(x)+3g(x))

what i get is 18/0 as x ->+inf. and i think this means that as the denominator gets closer to 0, the value gets larger.

sorry this is a dumb question
 
about the second part - acutally the last x isn't in the radical.

I get it now I was confused as how the x factors out of the radical...
 
Ok about the first part again, You cannot compute the limit with limit laws, because the limit of the denominator tends to 0, and the limit laws of the quotient require the limit of the denominator does not tend to 0, so it's simply said the limit does not exist.

The problem with the limit laws is that it assumes the limits of f(x) and g(x) exist and are finite.
 
Last edited:
"Infinity" is not a number. Saying that "the limit is not infinity" is just saying that the limit does not exist in a particular way. If the denominator of a fraction goes to 0 and the numerator does not, "the limit is infininity" and "the limit does not exist" may both be true.
 
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K