Hedonism defined in terms of sentience.

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_truth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the philosophical implications of hedonism, particularly the belief that one's own sentience is the only proof of existence. It argues against this notion by highlighting the shared properties of sentience among individuals, thus challenging the validity of hedonism as a definition. The conversation also distinguishes between hedonism and selfishness, emphasizing that societal beliefs rely on a fundamental acceptance of others' sentience despite the hard problem of consciousness. The role of the scientific method in addressing these philosophical dilemmas is also noted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hedonism and its philosophical implications
  • Familiarity with the hard problem of consciousness
  • Knowledge of the scientific method and its application in philosophy
  • Basic concepts of sentience and its definitions in psychology
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the philosophical arguments surrounding the hard problem of consciousness
  • Research the differences between hedonism and ethical egoism
  • Investigate the role of the scientific method in philosophical inquiry
  • Examine psychological definitions and theories related to sentience
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, psychology students, and anyone interested in the ethical implications of sentience and hedonism.

the_truth
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
A hedonist believes the following.

"There is only proof that I am sentient. There is no proof that you are sentient. Therefore my will is the only thing that matters in the universe."

This is of course wrong as there is evidence to suggest that you are sentient as we both share certain properties, you merely cannot prove conclusively that other people are sentient due to the hard problem. The hard problem though isn't hard as it is obsoleted by the scientific method, thus hedonism is an incorrect definition.

www.dictionary.com
Psychology. The doctrine holding that behavior is motivated by the desire for pleasure and the avoidance of pain.

This is only one of 3 outcomes as a hedonist may also: acknowledge that other people are sentient and not care; not recognise the factors at hand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aren't you mixing up hedonism ("Only pleasure and pain matter") with selfishness ("Only my will matters")? And it has seemed to me for a long time that all society is based on a fundamental leap of faith:"Never mind the lack of evidence, I DO believe that other people are not zombies!"
 
"Aren't you mixing up hedonism ("Only pleasure and pain matter") with selfishness ("Only my will matters")? And it has seemed to me for a long time that all society is based on a fundamental leap of faith:"Never mind the lack of evidence, I DO believe that other people are not zombies!""

Evil is defined as causing pain to sentient beings. It is usually thought that greedy people don't care when they commit evil, but it could also be due to the hard problem, that you cannot prove your are sentient because you cannot make another entity perceive what you perceive.

This also leads to the proof that we have that other people are sentient, being that they also have human brains and brings other dilemmas concerning scientific method and the need for an observer in scientific method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
30K
  • · Replies 148 ·
5
Replies
148
Views
20K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
12K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
12K