Why is the adoption of HT superconductors so slow despite their advantages?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Art
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconductors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the slow adoption of high-temperature superconductors (HTSC) despite their advantages, such as increased current carrying capacity and efficiency. Participants explore the technological, economic, and physical challenges associated with HTSC applications in various fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that HTSC cables have been commercially available for some time, questioning why uptake has been slow despite advantages like high current capacity and efficiency.
  • There is a discussion about the operating temperatures of HTSC, with some participants stating that they operate around 40K, while others clarify that materials like YBCO have a critical temperature (Tc) of around 92K.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the low current density of HTSC compared to conventional superconductors, which may limit their practical applications.
  • Participants mention issues related to Type II superconductors, such as migrating vortices and flux lines in the presence of magnetic fields, which can disrupt superconductivity.
  • There is a discussion on the implications of operating at higher temperatures, where increased normal-state charge carriers can lead to power loss in AC transmission, complicating the use of HTSC.
  • One participant expresses interest in the commercial potential of HTSC, citing claims of significant size and weight reductions in applications like naval engines, while questioning the feasibility of these claims.
  • Another participant suggests that RF shielding might alleviate some of the challenges associated with HTSC applications, though the effectiveness of such solutions remains uncertain.
  • Limited current applications of HTSC are mentioned, with some participants noting that they are used in specific contexts, such as cell phone stations.
  • There is a perspective that even if technological challenges are addressed, the physics of HTSC will continue to yield new insights and developments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the challenges and potential of HTSC technology. There is no consensus on whether the limitations will always hinder applications or if solutions will emerge.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights various assumptions about the properties of HTSC, the economic factors influencing adoption, and the technological challenges that remain unresolved. Specific limitations in fabrication technology and the nature of superconductivity at elevated temperatures are noted.

Art
Given that HTSC cables have been commercially available for some time now why has the uptake of this technology been so slow. Even allowing for the extra cost I'd have thought the advantages such as 140x the current carrying capacity, far higher efficiency etc. would outway any possible disadvantages?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
how high a temp are we talking about..?
 
willib said:
how high a temp are we talking about..?
I believe around 40K which is the big advantage over LTS which require cooling to 10K. Thus instead of requiring liquid helium which is expensive they use liquid nitrogen which is cheaper than bottled water. As I understand it the coolant is built into the cable in some permanent way.
 
Art said:
I believe around 40K which is the big advantage over LTS which require cooling to 10K. Thus instead of requiring liquid helium which is expensive they use liquid nitrogen which is cheaper than bottled water. As I understand it the coolant is built into the cable in some permanent way.

Er.. no. LN2 has a boiling point of 77 K. So the operating temperature will have that as the maximum Tc for the superconductor to use LN2 has a coolant.

HTS such as YBCO has Tc of around 92 K. So this isn't the problem. The problem with most HTS is that it has a low current density, and so a low critical current density, beyond which, it becomes normal, when compared to conventional superconductors. Furthermore, as a Type II superconductor, there's problem with migrating vortices and flux lines when there's any significant magnetic fields (as there usually is when there's current carrying conductors or if it is placed in RF fields). These tend to cause many parts of the superconductor to not be superconducting.

One should also note that the higher the operating temperature, the less the density of supercurrent there is in the superconductor. What this means is that even if one is still below Tc, at elevated temperature, there will be more normal-state charge carriers present than at very low temperature close to 0K. While the DC resistivity of the superconductor will still be zero (since any potential applied will be "shorted" by the supercurrent), the AC resistivity of ANY superconductor is not zero. Here, the normal charge carriers/electrons also participate in the AC resistivity. So if you have a larger density of normal electrons at elevated temperatures, even if you're still in the superconducting state, you still lose power in AC transmission. For HTS, this is made worse because it is not a good normal state conductor in the first place - all HTS are doped ceramics.

This, among other things, have made the technological application of HTS very challenging.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Er.. no. LN2 has a boiling point of 77 K. So the operating temperature will have that as the maximum Tc for the superconductor to use LN2 has a coolant.

HTS such as YBCO has Tc of around 92 K. So this isn't the problem. The problem with most HTS is that it has a low current density, and so a low critical current density, beyond which, it becomes normal, when compared to conventional superconductors. Furthermore, as a Type II superconductor, there's problem with migrating vortices and flux lines when there's any significant magnetic fields (as there usually is when there's current carrying conductors or if it is placed in RF fields). These tend to cause many parts of the superconductor to not be superconducting.

One should also note that the higher the operating temperature, the less the density of supercurrent there is in the superconductor. What this means is that even if one is still below Tc, at elevated temperature, there will be more normal-state charge carriers present than at very low temperature close to 0K. While the DC resistivity of the superconductor will still be zero (since any potential applied will be "shorted" by the supercurrent), the AC resistivity of ANY superconductor is not zero. Here, the normal charge carriers/electrons also participate in the AC resistivity. So if you have a larger density of normal electrons at elevated temperatures, even if you're still in the superconducting state, you still lose power in AC transmission. For HTS, this is made worse because it is not a good normal state conductor in the first place - all HTS are doped ceramics.

This, among other things, have made the technological application of HTS very challenging.

Zz.
Thanks Zz,
I misread the article, it referred to the first HTS material discovered operating at 40K but the critical temperature for the material they are using is 108K. :blushing: Where I am coming from is I was looking at a company as an investment opportunity and I wondered why if they had what reads like such dream products they weren't flying out the door. For example their literature boasts of ships engines they're developing for the US navy 1/4 the size and 1/5 the weight of equal power conventional engines. It sounded too good to be true :smile: .
With current technology limitations do you think it is likely the applications for superconducting products will always be limited or would straightforward solutions such as RF shielding around the cable alleviate some of the problems you described?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Art said:
With current technology limitations do you think it is likely the applications for superconducting products will always be limited or would straightforward solutions such as RF shielding around the cable alleviate some of the problems you described?

There have been limited applications of HTS - I think cell phone stations use them in some form or another. Any application that doesn't require a large current would tend to be more suitable. However, unless they can make major progress in the fabrication technology (and recent developements appear to make headway), the use of HTS will be technologically hampered by the limitations I've mentioned.

From my perspective, as a physicist, the physics of HTS is more interesting since that has been what I've focused on. Even if we solve the technological issue, I don't think we'll ever see the end of new and exciting physics coming out of the study of HTS.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
5K