Destruction of our universe through collision with parallel

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of parallel universes and the potential for our universe to be destroyed through collisions with these other universes. Participants explore theoretical implications, the nature of such collisions, and the validity of parallel universe theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant speculates that our universe could be destroyed by colliding with a parallel universe, suggesting that such collisions could create new big bangs.
  • Another participant argues against the idea of universes destroying each other through collisions, comparing them to cells in a body that do not merge or affect each other despite bumping into one another.
  • A reference to Michio Kaku's work is made, indicating that collisions between membranes of universes could have significant repercussions, potentially leading to destructive events.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the existence of parallel universes, questioning their tangibility and the ability to prove their existence.
  • Another participant discusses the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, suggesting that belief in it may stem from a desire to rationalize certain quantum phenomena, while acknowledging that this view is not universally accepted.
  • It is proposed that the parallel universe theory might explain the fine-tuning of our universe for intelligent life, with speculation that gravity could be felt between membranes, leading to potential negative effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some supporting the idea of parallel universes and their potential interactions, while others are skeptical about their existence and the implications of such collisions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions, such as the nature of parallel universes, the mechanisms of their interactions, and the lack of empirical evidence for their existence. The discussion reflects differing interpretations of theoretical physics without reaching consensus.

gmoney
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was just thinking if big bangs in other universes are created by collision of other universes and merging then splitting apart, I was thinking, could be possible that our universe could just suddenly be destroyed by our universe colliding with a one of our parallel universe in a sea of other bubbles. So at anytime our existence could just be voided as another big bang is created from the merger of our universe with another. Just a thought, would like clearing up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm

I do not believe they can destroy each other by bumping and such. Think of each one as a different cell in your body expanding, bumping, createing new ones. They are very similar. Just as once cell doesn't combine with another when they bump, there isn't any threat of this. Each cell contains it's whole part, and that part isn't affected by such common daily activities.
 
On page 223 of Parallel Worlds, Michio Kaku gives some insight into this part of the theory:
The force of the collision pushes the two universes apart. As these two membranes separate from each other, they cool rapidly, giving us the universe we see today... But gravity continues to attract the two membranes, until, trillions of years later, they collide once again, and the cycle repeats all over again.
(This also means that there are possibly other membranes floating out there in hyperspace that may collide with ours in the future, creating another big splat. Given the fact that our universe is accelerating, another collision may in fact be likely. Steinhardt adds, "Maybe the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is a precursor of such a collision. It is not a pleasant thought.")
I think that it would be reasonable to conclude from this picture that if membranes collided with each other, the repercussions would be felt all throughout the universe in a generally unwelcome manner. Although bubbles don't merge with each other, perhaps bubble membranes of this magnitude do create negative effects (i.e., massive heat explosion from the collision) within themselves. Cells are certainly not the same as bubble universes.
 
I don't even believe in parallel universes. How can it be proven? Can we get there? Is it tangible?(you know what I mean. Can we get there and live in it?) Until we can prove that there are parallel universes, I would stop worrying about us all dying in the blink of an eye. That's not how this is going to throw down.
 
Some people believe in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics because they have convinced themselves that it is the only rational way to deal with the problems of "the collapse of the wave function" aka the projection postulate. Whether many-worlds approach is a rational response is something reasonable people can differ on.

As for any other multiverse idea, including infinitely many inequivalent string theory vacua, there isn't even that much reason to believe it.
 
The parallel universe theory is the only thing that can explain why our part of the universe is so finely tuned as to allow intelligent life to exist even though there is no direct evidence. According to recent speculation gravity can be felt between membranes and therefore large masses from adjacent membranes could have unpleasant results.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
6K