Tony Blair's Defiance Over the European Rebate

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Tony Blair's stance on the European rebate, a financial mechanism related to the UK's contributions to the EU budget. Participants explore the historical context, implications of the rebate, and the ongoing tensions between the UK and other EU member states, particularly France and Germany. The conversation touches on political maneuvering, economic impacts, and the dynamics of EU negotiations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the rebate's nature and significance, seeking clarification on the ongoing debate.
  • One participant explains that the UK has historically contributed more to the EU than it receives, leading to the establishment of the rebate under Margaret Thatcher's leadership.
  • It is noted that the rebate is currently worth £3.5 billion and that France and Germany are opposed to it, with France's contributions expected to exceed those of the UK.
  • Participants mention that Blair has suggested a potential renegotiation of the rebate in exchange for reductions in farm subsidies, indicating a complex negotiation landscape.
  • Several comments reflect a humorous take on the rivalry between France and Britain, suggesting that the political disagreements provide entertainment value.
  • There are references to the European Constitution and its perceived impact on such political disputes, with some participants expressing skepticism about its effectiveness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement, with some expressing clarity on the rebate's implications while others remain confused. The discussion reflects multiple competing views regarding the rebate's necessity and the political strategies involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants' understanding of the rebate is influenced by historical context and ongoing political dynamics, with some assumptions about the motivations of various countries involved in the EU budget discussions. The conversation includes references to specific financial figures and political actions that may not be universally agreed upon.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals following EU politics, those studying international relations, or anyone curious about the financial dynamics between member states within the European Union.

Andy
Messages
76
Reaction score
14
Howdy people, as some of you have hopefully seen on the news Tony Blair is defying Europe about this Rebate watchamacallit. I think it must be good if gerhard schroder and good old jacques don't want the british to have it. But i still don't know what it is, so can anyone explain what it is and what the reason for the big argument is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Andy said:
I think it must be good if gerhard schroder and good old jacques don't want the british to have it. But i still don't know what it is,
Oh nice logic there sparky.
 
lol, well's everyone already knows I am a fool so why pretend any different.
 
Basically, since Thatcher faffed about with the EU in 1984, the UK has been pouring a shedload of money into the EU, and doesn't get as much back. Instead, we've been getting this rebate, which gives us some of our money back. It's something to do with farmers.

Anyway, it's been proposed that the amount of this rebate is to be fixed for the period from 2007-2013. This could mean that we lose out on something like £20 billion, and still be paying a third more than France does.

Tony doesn't like this plan, so he's saying "no thanks".

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/eu/story/0,9061,1506172,00.html#article_continue
 
Andy said:
Howdy people, as some of you have hopefully seen on the news Tony Blair is defying Europe about this Rebate watchamacallit. I think it must be good if gerhard schroder and good old jacques don't want the british to have it. But i still don't know what it is, so can anyone explain what it is and what the reason for the big argument is?
All member countries make a donation to the EU based on the size of their economy. Britain's nett contribution was the biggest (money paid in vs subsidies received) and so under Margaret Thatcher's leadership Britain demanded and got an annual rebate currently worth £3.5 billion. Basically M. Thatcher blackmailed them at the time by vetoing all new legislation until they gave her what she wanted. Ever since the French and the Germans have wanted this rebate stopped. France will shortly be paying more than Britain in nett terms and are increasingly incensed by the rebate. Britain meanwhile is threatening to veto this years budget if the French and Germans don't get off their case. This will hurt the French particularly as their farmers are major recipients of EU subsidies. T. Blair has offered that Britain will renegotiate on the rebate if France will renegotiate on the farm subsidies (as in a major reduction) and so the fun continues.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Art said:
T. Blair has offered that Britain will renegotiate on the rebate if France will renegotiate on the farm subsidies (as in a major reduction) and so the fun continues.

And to say that this kind of fun wouldn't take place anymore with the European Constitution (R.I.P.) :cry:
 
Thanks people, kinda cleared it up but think i will stay out of politics for a while.
 
vanesch said:
And to say that this kind of fun wouldn't take place anymore with the European Constitution (R.I.P.) :cry:
lol personally I'd miss it. Watching France and Britain going at it 'hammer and tongs' is the best free entertainment available.
 
Art said:
lol personally I'd miss it. Watching France and Britain going at it 'hammer and tongs' is the best free entertainment available.

You're right: it would be the end of a millennium-long tradition :-p
Some things, you just have to keep them I guess :biggrin:
 
  • #10
Andy said:
Howdy people, as some of you have hopefully seen on the news Tony Blair is defying Europe about this Rebate watchamacallit. I think it must be good if gerhard schroder and good old jacques don't want the british to have it. But i still don't know what it is, so can anyone explain what it is and what the reason for the big argument is?

I think because its a mail-in rebate instead of an instant rebate
:smile: :smile:
 
  • #11
vanesch said:
You're right: it would be the end of a millennium-long tradition :-p
Some things, you just have to keep them I guess :biggrin:

Yeah, when the French voted "no" last week, I was almost worried that we'd actually start to get along!

But now, it's business as usual, then...
 
  • #12
brewnog said:
Yeah, when the French voted "no" last week, I was almost worried that we'd actually start to get along!

But now, it's business as usual, then...

lol "ok back to plans for WW3"
 
  • #13
Pengwuino said:
lol "ok back to plans for WW3"

Nahh, it's more friendly than that. I reckon it's like hating your little sister or something.
 
  • #14
brewnog said:
Nahh, it's more friendly than that. I reckon it's like hating your little sister or something.
Yes, but which one of you is the little sister? :-p
 
  • #15
jma2001 said:
Yes, but which one of you is the little sister? :-p

It doesn't matter, the contempt is mutual!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K