A simple permutation question or not so simple

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter johnnyICON
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permutation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of seating arrangements for 2 men and 3 women in a row, specifically ensuring that no two men sit beside each other. Participants explore various approaches to solve the problem, including permutations and combinations, while also considering variations in the number of men and women.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests calculating the arrangements as 2! * 3!, alternating men and women, but expresses doubt about the correctness of this approach.
  • Another participant lists several arrangements and calculates the total as 72 ways, contingent on their calculations being correct.
  • A participant proposes increasing the number of men and women to 4 and 5, respectively, and questions how to determine the number of valid arrangements without listing them all.
  • One participant suggests treating the two men as a single unit, allowing for permutations of their arrangement.
  • Clarification is provided that each individual is distinguishable, which affects the calculations.
  • Another participant lists arrangements and calculates a total of 9 valid configurations, proposing a formula of 5!*4!*9 for the total arrangements.
  • A participant introduces a related problem involving seating at a round table and presents a solution involving combinations and factorials, leading to a total of 1,814,400 arrangements.
  • Multiple participants discuss the method of placing women first and then filling in spaces for men, calculating combinations and permutations, with one confirming the method aligns with their professor's expectations.
  • A humorous remark is made about the possibility of women sitting on men's laps, adding a light-hearted note to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and calculations without reaching a consensus on the correct approach or total number of arrangements. Disagreements and uncertainties about the calculations and methods persist throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' calculations depend on specific assumptions about distinguishability and arrangement rules, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion includes various approaches that may not fully resolve the problem's complexity.

johnnyICON
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
How many ways can 2 men and 3 women be seated in a row such that no 2 men are sitting beside each other?

Now I have always had a problem with overthinking these kinds of questions. I'll usually write something down but then doubt myself.

What I did was simply did 2! * 3!.
3 * 2 * 2 * 1 * 1
W M W M W
That's by alternating women with men.

But here comes me overthinking the problem again.
I could altenate with men first, and then have 2 women sitting beside each other.
M W M W W right?
Or W W M W M...

Ahhh I feel like an idiot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mWWWm
mWWmW
mWmWW
WmWWm
WmWmW
WWmWm

In each of these arrangements, there are 2!3! ways to choose the men and women, so there are 72 ways to arrange them. (Unless, of course, I've made a mistake somewhere.)
 
What if I were to up the ante of men and women to 4 and 5, respectively.
During an exam, I shouldn't be writing all the possible permutations for the problem.

I would get 4!5! for each arrangement, but how do I know how many arrangements there is going to be?
 
you must think of the 2 men as 1 with 2 permutation for MaMb and MbMa.
 
I should of mentioed that each person is distinguishable from another. There are no two that are a like.
 
What I got was,
mWmWmWmWW
WmWmWmWmW
WWmWmWmWm
mWWmWmWmW
WmWWmWmWm
mWmWWmWmW
WmWmWWmWm
mWmWmWWmW
WmWmWmWWm

There are 9 in total. Each arrangement is 5!4!.
Therefore 5!*4!*9 is the number of ways this can be done.

Is this coorect?
 
here is a solution that I found, but uses a round table instead of a row.

How many ways can 5 man and 7 women be seated at a round table with
no 2 men next to each other?
Solution. First place the women in 6!. Now there are 7C5 ways to pick
5 spots for the men so that they are not adjancent. Finally, in each
of these 5 spots, the men can be placed in 5! ways. Hence, there are
5!6!7C5 = 1814400.

What I have is 5!4!5C4
 
Do it this way:
First place the women in order. This is 5!. Then place the men in the spaces between the women. There are 6 spaces (including the ends) so you have C(6, 4) * 4! ways to place the men, and 5! * C(6, 4) * 4! altogether.

Now I'll check by listing:

110000 wwmwmwmwm
101000 wmwwmwmwm
100100 wmwmwwmwm
100010 wmwmwmwwm
100001 wmwmwmwmw
011000 mwwwmwmwm
010100 mwwmwwmwm
010010 mwwmwmwwm
010001 mwwmwmwmw
001100 mwmwwwmwm
001010 mwmwwmwwm
001001 mwmwwmwmw
000110 mwmwmwwwm
000101 mwmwmwwmw
000011 mwmwmwmww

So there are indeed C(6, 2) = 15 ways to arrange the men and women before permuting.
 
BicycleTree said:
Do it this way:
First place the women in order. This is 5!. Then place the men in the spaces between the women. There are 6 spaces (including the ends) so you have C(6, 4) * 4! ways to place the men, and 5! * C(6, 4) * 4! altogether.

Now I'll check by listing:

110000 wwmwmwmwm
101000 wmwwmwmwm
100100 wmwmwwmwm
100010 wmwmwmwwm
100001 wmwmwmwmw
011000 mwwwmwmwm
010100 mwwmwwmwm
010010 mwwmwmwwm
010001 mwwmwmwmw
001100 mwmwwwmwm
001010 mwmwwmwwm
001001 mwmwwmwmw
000110 mwmwmwwwm
000101 mwmwmwwmw
000011 mwmwmwmww

So there are indeed C(6, 2) = 15 ways to arrange the men and women before permuting.


awesome man, this is exactly how my prof wanted us to do it. thanks
 
  • #10
johnnyICON said:
How many ways can 2 men and 3 women be seated in a row such that no 2 men are sitting beside each other?

Don't forget you can always have two of the women sit on the men's lap. :!)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K