Doppler effect: Moving source with reflection

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Doppler effect as it pertains to a moving sound source and the reflection of sound waves from a stationary wall. Participants are examining how the frequency of the sound heard by two different listeners, one moving with the source and the other stationary, differs due to the Doppler shift.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the frequencies heard by the moving listener and the stationary listener, questioning the calculations and interpretations of the Doppler shift. There is a focus on the mathematical expressions used to describe the frequency shifts and whether they accurately reflect the situation described.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and calculations. Some participants are questioning the accuracy of the expressions presented, while others are attempting to clarify the distinction between frequency and frequency shift. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the dialogue is productive in addressing misunderstandings.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of the Doppler effect, particularly in the context of moving sources and reflections. There is an emphasis on ensuring the correct interpretation of the mathematical relationships involved, with some participants indicating potential misreadings of the original problem.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Suppose a sound source S is moving towards a stationary wall and that a listener L1 is moving with the sound source. Describe in a few lines why the reflected sound heard by the listener L1 is Doppler-shifted by about twice the amount that a second listener L2 would hear standing by the wall.

The sound waves in front of the moving source are compressed causing an apparent increase in frequency to [itex]f_{L_2} = \frac{v}{v - v_S}f_S[/itex], where v is the speed of sound. The sound reflected from the wall has the same frequency [itex]f_{L_2}[/itex]. L1 is approaching the wall with speed [itex]v_S[/itex], so the relative speed of the wavefronts of sound is [itex]v + v_S[/itex]. The frequency observed by L1 is [itex]f_{L_1} = \frac{v + v_S}{v}f_{L_2} = \frac{v + v_S}{v - v_S}f_{S}[/itex] which is approximately equal to [itex]2f_{L_2}[/itex] for [itex]v_S[/itex] close to [itex]v[/itex]. Does this answer make sense, or is it unnecessarily complicated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not quite right. Your expression certainly does NOT reduce to 2 fs for vs close to v.

But you're asked about the shift, not the final frequency.
 
The equation does reduce to [itex]2f_{L_2}[/itex] look at the equation again. It seems pretty clear to me that the question is asking about the final effect of the doppler shift on the original frequency [itex]f_{L_2}[/itex]. Could you explain what you mean by this?

Edit: [itex]2f_S[/itex] should be [itex]2f_{L_2}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
It appears that you misread my original post. The frequency reduces to [itex]2f_{L_2}[/itex], not [itex]2f_S[/itex].
 
Your equation is:

[tex]f_{L_1} = \frac{v + v_S}{v - v_S}f_{S}[/tex]

This is the equation for the frequency [itex]f_{L_1}[/itex], and not the shift, which would be

[tex]f_{L_1} - f_S = \left(\frac{1 + v_S/v}{1 - v_S/v} - 1\right)f_S[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

[tex]f_{L_1} - f_S = \frac{1 + v_S/v - (1 - v_S/v)}{1 - v_S/v}f_S = \frac{2 v_S/v}{1 - v_S/v}[/tex]

For [itex]v_S << v[/itex], we can see that the shift is approximately [itex]2 v_S/v[/itex].

If, on the other hand, [itex]v_S \approx v[/itex] then the shift becomes very large.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K