How would other countries fare as the world superpower?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the potential performance of various countries or groups of countries as global leaders, excluding the United States. It includes historical examples of past world powers and their influences, as well as considerations of a balanced power dynamic in the current global context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests speculating on the performance of countries or groups of countries as leaders in global events and influence.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for a balance of power that includes the U.S., indicating a preference for a multipolar world scenario.
  • A participant provides historical examples of past world powers, noting their actions and impacts, such as Rome's conquests and Britain's colonization.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of having global powers, with a participant questioning the necessity of such powers altogether.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the concept of global powers, with some advocating for a balance of power that includes the U.S., while others reflect on the historical consequences of past powers and question the need for such dominance in the world.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes historical references that may depend on interpretations of past events and their relevance to current global dynamics. There is also an implicit assumption that the U.S. will remain a significant player in any future power balance.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Take a country or group of countries (other than the U. S.) and speculate their possible performance as the leader in global events and influence.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Loren Booda said:
Take a country or group of countries (other than the U. S.) and speculate their possible performance as the leader in global events and influence.
I'm glad you provide "group of countries" as an option. But I would like to see a balance of power, which would still include the U.S. (and this is the likely scenario IMO).
 
How about what other prominent world powers have already done?

Rome - Conquered/annexed/enslaved most of Europe.
Spain - Annihilated multiple Mesoamerican and South American civilizations.
Portugal - Began the African slave trade.
Britain - Colonized half the world.

Prominent regional powers?

France - Colonial debacles in Indochina and Algeria.
Italy - Mechanized Italian army takes over Ethopia; Ethiopians defend themselves with spears.
Japan - Attempted to annex the entire Pacific Rim and all of China.
Soviet Union - Puppet regimes across eastern Europe and the caucasus terrorize their own people.

In retrospect, maybe we shouldn't have powers.
 
loseyourname said:
In retrospect, maybe we shouldn't have powers.
Q. F. E.

was hoping someone would say that sooner rather than later
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
9K
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
15K