Calculating Orbit Distance from Equator w/ Particle in Bowl

  • Thread starter Thread starter Päällikkö
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the distance from the equator to the orbit of a particle moving in a frictionless bowl, characterized by its radius R and velocity v. Participants are exploring the relationships between various parameters, including gravitational acceleration g and the radius of the orbit r.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present different equations relating velocity, gravitational force, and distance, with some expressing uncertainty about the validity of their solutions. There is a focus on the implications of negative values for distance and the reasoning behind rejecting certain solutions based on physical constraints.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their derived equations and questioning the correctness of their solutions. Some guidance is offered regarding the necessity for positive values of distance, and there is an exploration of methods to determine the appropriate solution among the quadratic results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the distance 'd' must be positive, as negative values would imply an unphysical scenario where the particle is above the bowl. There is also mention of the difficulty in predicting outcomes without computational tools or derivatives.

Päällikkö
Homework Helper
Messages
516
Reaction score
11
I suppose I could've used the "Fast particle in a bowl" thread, but as this is a different problem, I decided not to.

If you set a particle to move in a frictionless bowl (radius R) at the velocity v, how far is the orbit from the equator?

I got the following equations:
[tex]tan\alpha = \frac{v^2}{gr}[/tex]
[tex]r = Rsin\alpha[/tex]
[tex]d = Rcos\alpha[/tex]
where g is the constant 9,81[tex]\frac{m}{s^2}[/tex] and r the radius of the orbit.

I ended up with [tex]d = \frac{\frac{v^2}{gR}-\sqrt{(\frac{v^2}{gR})^2+4}}{-2}R[/tex], which seems a little complicated but gives reasonable answers. I haven't yet figured out why it only works with - in front of the square root (I got both plus and minus when I solved the equations). Is my solution correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got
[tex] d = \frac {-v^2 + \sqrt {v^4 + 4g^2r^2}}{2g}[/tex]
I think that's the same as what you got.
By putting v=0, I get d=R. Which is a reasonable answer.

I got a quadratic in d. That's where the minus sign came from.
 
siddharth said:
I got
[tex] d = \frac {-v^2 + \sqrt {v^4 + 4g^2r^2}}{2g}[/tex]
I think that's the same as what you got.
Yep, it is the same.
By putting v=0, I get d=R. Which is a reasonable answer.

I got a quadratic in d. That's where the minus sign came from.

I got a quadratic too, from which I get two solutions (the plus/minus-sign). I'm uncertain why the other solution is wrong.
 
I took the value of d to be from the center of the bowl to the projection of the particle on the vertical axis.

This value must be positive.If I take one of the solutions of the quadratic, then the value of d will always be negative.

Because this is not possible (ie, the value of d must always be positive as the particle moves only in the bowl), I rejected the value and took the other value.
 
siddharth said:
This value must be positive.If I take one of the solutions of the quadratic, then the value of d will always be negative.
The outcome cannot be predicted before the final solution(s), or can it?

Is taking a derivative the only "proper" way to figure out which solution is correct?
 
'd' must be positive because the way I measure it, a negative value of 'd' would mean that the particle is above the hemi-spherical bowl (Where there is no bowl!).Thus, in the context of the question, this answer can be neglected.
 
siddharth said:
'd' must be positive because the way I measure it, a negative value of 'd' would mean that the particle is above the hemi-spherical bowl (Where there is no bowl!).Thus, in the context of the question, this answer can be neglected.
Yes, I know it. But without a calculator or taking derivative, is there a way to figure out which of the solutions is right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K