Reading Smythe's book on static and dynamic electricity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around challenges faced by a participant in deriving formulas from Smythe's book on "static and dynamic electricity." The focus includes specific equations related to Gauss's electric flux theorem and trigonometric identities. Participants suggest alternative textbooks for clearer derivations and understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • A participant expresses difficulty in deriving formulas from Smythe's book, specifically questioning the presence of a superfluous K in Gauss's electric flux theorem and the derivation of an expression involving trigonometric identities.
  • Another participant suggests using a newer high-level electromagnetism book for clearer derivations, stating that no trigonometry is necessary for deriving Gauss's law.
  • One participant recommends checking the library for Griffiths' book as an alternative resource.
  • Another participant mentions their preference for Schwartz's Principles of Electrodynamics, highlighting its physical arguments and integration of special relativity.
  • A different viewpoint notes that Griffiths is considered lower level than Smythe, while Schwartz's approach may not directly aid in understanding electrostatics. They also mention a new book by Franklin that is comparable to Smythe's level but less complicated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best resource for understanding the material, with multiple competing views on the suitability of different textbooks and their approaches to the subject matter.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the derivations and the assumptions made in the formulas presented in Smythe's book. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with the material and differing opinions on the effectiveness of alternative texts.

Nakis
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
reading Smythe's book on "static and dynamic electricity"

Hi,

I am reading Smythe's book on "static and dynamic electricity" (1st edition, 1939) and I'm having trouble deriving some of the formulas. I wonder if someone already corrected that. For instance,

1.10 - Gauss's electric flux theorem. The expression for the normal flux component has a superfluous K : [tex]dN = E_n \cdot dS[/tex]
1.101 - I can't seem to obtain the expression for N, unless if [tex]sin^2(\alpha) = 2 \cdot (1 - cos(\alpha))[/tex] (actually : [tex]1- cos(2\alpha) = 2 \cdot sin^2(\alpha)[/tex]).

thanks,

Nakis
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you try a newer high level EM book with clearer derivations than Smythe.
No trig is needed to derive Gauss's law.
 
Check your library for Griffiths.
 
I personally like the Schwartz Principles of Electrodynamics. His arguments are very physical, and he more or less teaches you the basics of special relativity at a very natural point in the book; the middle, not as an afterthought.
 
Griffiths is lower level than Smythe. Schwartz has a great book, but starting with SR doesn't help electrostatics. There is a new book "Classical Electromagnetism"
by Franklin (Addison-Wesley) that is close to Smythe's (or Jackson's) level with less complication.
 

Similar threads

Replies
92
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K