K, the idealized surface current density

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of surface current density, denoted as K, in the context of electromagnetism, specifically as it relates to the vector potential A in a medium with varying properties.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks a rigorous definition of K and its integral form, expressing confusion about its implications in a specific scenario involving permeable media. Participants provide definitions and attempt to clarify the relationship between K and A.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring definitions and implications of surface current density K, with some providing references to textbooks. There is ongoing questioning regarding the direction of the vector potential A in relation to K, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

One participant expresses uncertainty about the term "permeable," indicating a potential gap in understanding the material properties being discussed. This suggests that assumptions about the medium's characteristics are under examination.

Palindrom
Messages
263
Reaction score
0
K, the "idealized surface current density"

Hey, I don't quite understand that guy, K.

I have an exam on Sunday in E&M, I'm studying from Jackson. I haven't found any definition of 'K'.

If anyone could give me a rigurous definition and an integral form, if there's any, I'd appreciate it.
Oh, and since we're at it, I stumped into that next statement:
"Suppose that the upper half of space is filled with a permeable media, while the other half is empty space. If, in the x-y plane, K is in the x direction, it follows that A (vector potential) is also in that direction in the entire space".
Huh?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What definition do you have so far with which you are unsatisfied?

Griffiths (pp.211) gives the following definition: "When charge flows over a surface, we describe it by the surface current density K, defined as follows: Consider a "ribbon" of infinitesimal width [itex]dl_\perp[/itex], running parallel to the flow. If the current in this ribbon is [itex]d\vec{I}[/itex], the surface current density is

[tex]\vec{K}=\frac{d\vec{I}}{dl_\perp}[/tex]

In words, K is the current per unit width-perpendicular -to-flow. In particular, if the (mobile) surface charge density is [itex]\sigma[/itex] and the velocity is [itex]\vec{v}[/itex], then

[tex]\vec{K}=\sigma \vec{v}[/tex]"

It is not written but I believe we can write the integral form as

[tex]I_{surface} = \int_{\mathcal{P}}\vec{K}\cdot d\vec{l}[/tex]

where [itex]\mathcal{P}[/itex] is a path across the surface.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks.
But then, in the statement I gave, why is A in the x direction? I just can't see it.
 
I don't know what permeable means, I'll have to leave that one to someone else.
 
It may not be the right term. It simply means it's a linear matter for some 'miu'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K