Thread Closed

A massless string

 
Share Thread
Apr5-03, 01:20 PM   #1
 
Question

A massless string


So I have a wave incident on a boundary problem. The incidence is normal and the boundary is a knot of mass 'm' at z = 0, with the wave coming from minus infinity. The problem is that the string on the other side is massless, and I can't figure out exactly how that effects the boundary conditions. I know the string must be continuous as the first condition, and:

T*[df(+) - df(-)] = m*d^2f/dz^2

as the second condition. Where df(+) is the first derivative on the positive side of z = 0 and df(-) is the derivative on the negative side.

What I thought to do was let df(+) = 0 because there is no force coming from that side, but that hasn't worked. I also tried letting the transmitted wave be imaginary only because without mass I can't see how a string could vibrate, and that didn't work either. Any help would be much appreciated.
PhysOrg.com physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Kenneth Wilson, Nobel winner for physics, dies
>> Two collider research teams find evidence of new particle Zc(3900)
>> Scientists make first direct images of topological insulator's edge currents
Apr5-03, 02:17 PM   #2
 
Originally posted by Thorazine
What I thought to do was let df(+) = 0 because there is no force coming from that side...
Thorazine, I think this is physically correct. I think df/dz=0 everywhere in the massless part. Could you please explain why it doesn't work?
Apr5-03, 07:39 PM   #3
 
I could be wrong but shouldn't the equation be:

m*[df(+) - df(-)]/dz = T*(d^2f/dz^2)


Maybe?
Apr6-03, 12:18 AM   #4
 

A massless string


Originally posted by arcnets
Thorazine, I think this is physically correct. I think df/dz=0 everywhere in the massless part. Could you please explain why it doesn't work?
I know it's not correct because it doesn't give me the right answer, I don't know why it doesn't work. :)
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: A massless string
Thread Forum Replies
Massless String General Discussion 18
Re: Massless Particles General Physics 2
Re: Massless Particles General Physics 0
Re: Massless Particles General Physics 0
Massless Quarks...? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 5