Thread Closed

Stunning Revolution in Physics or dumb Newspaper?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Aug19-05, 09:04 PM   #1
 

Stunning Revolution in Physics or dumb Newspaper?


Ok, I was looking through technocrat and I saw a link to this article which claims, that physicists have not only succeeding in slowing down, but also in speeding up the speed of light. I assume it is actually talking about the speed of light in the medium or something, but the article doesn't seem to claim that, does anybody know what was actually accomplished, I doubt the laws of physics were suddenly overturned with this little fanfare.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-ltt081905.php

~Lyuokdea
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> As chaos celebrates its 50th birthday, biophysicist develops a new method to visualize it
>> Novel features of helium-3 superfluidity discovered with new SQUID detector chip
>> Physics of 'green waves' could make city traffic flow more smoothly
Aug19-05, 09:37 PM   #2
 
Being in an optical fibre my guess would be "in a medium"
Aug19-05, 10:03 PM   #3

Community 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Lyuokdea
Ok, I was looking through technocrat and I saw a link to this article which claims, that physicists have not only succeeding in slowing down, but also in speeding up the speed of light. I assume it is actually talking about the speed of light in the medium or something, but the article doesn't seem to claim that, does anybody know what was actually accomplished, I doubt the laws of physics were suddenly overturned with this little fanfare.
but they've also accomplished the considerable feat of speeding it up – making light go faster than the speed of light.
Sounds like its in a medium or the world would have gone insane. I suppose we need to determine how important is it in context then we can figure out what they meant by speeding up light. I guess if all experiments so far have simply been to slow down light, it would be very exciting if they were able to speed it back up again after its been slown down.

And by taking 10 more seconds to continue reading, I stumbled upon this.

They were also able to create extreme conditions in which the light signal travelled faster than 300 million meters a second. And even though this seems to violate all sorts of cherished physical assumptions, Einstein needn't move over – relativity isn't called into question, because only a portion of the signal is affected.
What does that mean?
Aug19-05, 10:13 PM   #4
 

Stunning Revolution in Physics or dumb Newspaper?


Its probably a fibre that changes properties upon a given signal, such as electric current. This change in properties can either speed up or slow doen light. As for the claims that they can make it go faster than the speed of light in a vacum, (if they do claim that at all) I dont believe it.

Regards,

Nenad
Aug19-05, 11:01 PM   #5
 
Looking around I found a more in depth article that seems to argue that it has to do with changing the phase velocities for the different frequencies of light moving through the cable. I think they are talking about this illusion coming from quantum mechanical phenomena, but does it actually allow particles to move faster than the speed of light?

http://www.livescience.com/technolog...fastlight.html

~Lyuokdea
Aug19-05, 11:05 PM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Yes, it is phase velocity they are talking about.
Aug20-05, 01:52 AM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Tide is correct, they are talking about phase velocity [which is irrelevant]. Relativity is not imperiled until useful information is communicated at superluminal velocities.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Stunning Revolution in Physics or dumb Newspaper?
Thread Forum Replies
Time + Physics = I feel dumb Introductory Physics Homework 1
Physics 101 Problems, need help. I'm dumb. Introductory Physics Homework 2
new theory of time-space: revolution in physics 1 General Physics 0
I think this is a physics question, might seem dumb but it's been bugging me all week General Physics 12