Finding Max Load for Cantilever Beam of AlN

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the maximum load that can be applied to a cantilever beam made of aluminum nitride (AlN) without causing failure. Participants explore concepts related to material properties, stress calculations, and failure criteria, while considering the implications of using AlN in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the need for a failure criterion, suggesting that reaching plasticity stress indicates technical failure, and mentions other criteria like Von-Mises and Tresca.
  • Another participant questions whether the maximum stress occurs at the fixed end or the free end of the beam, indicating uncertainty in the location of maximum stress.
  • A participant proposes using the equation for stress, S = Mc/I, to understand how stress varies along the beam, but acknowledges the complexity in determining the breaking point due to non-linear behavior as the beam deforms.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of information on the ultimate tensile strength of AlN, which is necessary for accurately calculating the breaking load.
  • One participant suggests that the beam's application in a micro switch context may influence the load calculations, as it will deflect under voltage.
  • Another participant recommends using flexure strength to estimate the stress at which the beam will break and suggests applying a factor of safety to determine a safe load limit.
  • There is a discussion about the reliability of textbook data for material properties and the suggestion to obtain more accurate strength data from suppliers or through experimental testing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the location of maximum stress and the appropriate methods for calculating the maximum load. There is no consensus on how to proceed due to the complexity of the problem and the lack of specific material properties.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in available information, such as the need for material properties like ultimate tensile strength and yield strength, which are critical for accurate calculations. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the applicability of standard formulas to the specific context of a cantilever beam made from a brittle material like aluminum nitride.

Physics_wiz
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
I'm an undergrad. student trying to do research. Today was my first day working with grad students and one grad student gave me something to find. We have a cantilever beam made of aluminum nitride (AlN). The only things known about the beam are the dimensions and young's modulus. He wants to find the max load that could be applied to the free end of the beam without the beam breaking. I looked in my mechanics of materials book and found a formula for the displacement of the free end but I don't know how to find the max load. I don't even know if this problem is doable given that we only know the material's young's modulus. I'll try to find some online information and read some more in the mechanics of materials book. In the mean time, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Physics_wiz said:
I'm an undergrad. student trying to do research. Today was my first day working with grad students and one grad student gave me something to find. We have a cantilever beam made of aluminum nitride (AlN). The only things known about the beam are the dimensions and young's modulus. He wants to find the max load that could be applied to the free end of the beam without the beam breaking. I looked in my mechanics of materials book and found a formula for the displacement of the free end but I don't know how to find the max load. I don't even know if this problem is doable given that we only know the material's young's modulus. I'll try to find some online information and read some more in the mechanics of materials book. In the mean time, any help would be greatly appreciated.

Ok, I congrat you for starting your researching career!. When sometime passes, you will laugh at these first steps!.

1) You need a failure criterion. Usually, it is considered for engineering purposes that if in any section of the beam is reached the plasticity stress, then the beam gets into technical failure. There are another criterions such as Von-Mises and Tresca.

2) Once you have the maximum stress your beam can deal, you have to look for the section in which it will be probably reached. This question is left for you, try to think of it and solve on your own.

3) Knowing the beam dimensions and the Young modulus, you can obtain the displacement which causes that maximum stress in the section chosen, and then the load which should be applied for failure.

Good luck.

EDIT: changed "fracture" by "failure".
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply.

1) Is that a property of the material? If I don't have it, do you know what tests or resources it could be obtained from?

2) I'm guessing the max stress will happen in the middle top part.

3) The equation to use is: Max stress = (Young modulus) (change in length/original length). Right? I have the max stress from (1) and young's modulus and the original length of the beam (top part). The change in length is the horizontal change in length of the whole beam (top part) right? After that is found I have to find the max downwards displacement of the free end and plug it in the equation in my book to get the max force. Did I get all that right? Also, if I know the change in length of the top part of the beam, how do I find the max downward displacement of the free end?

Thanks again.
 
Hmmmm I take number 2 back. The max stress occurs at the fixed end where the moment is maximum. I don't think I know how to find #3 yet though.
 
Hey physics_wiz. Calculating the stress in a cantalivered beam is one thing. Calculating the load required to break the beam is a different issue because to break the beam, things must happen that are not easily calculable. In a typical beam, deformation occurs along the fibers farthest from the neutral axis because the tensile stress is linearly proportional to the distance from the neutral axis. This can be seen from the equation for stress:

S = Mc/I

Where S = stress
M = Moment
c = distance from neutral axis
I = moment of inertia

As the beam deforms, the stress no longer remains linearly proportional as the equation suggests. As the beam yeilds, the stress in the outermost fibers remains almost constant and stretches, while the fibers at a lesser distance to the neutral axis begin to yield. It would be easier to draw a picture here, but those are the limitations of a message board.

A second issue also needs attention. If the beam is long in relation to the depth, the moment does not increase linearly with increased force. That's because the distance between the wall where the beam is mounted and the force decreases as the beam bends.

Taking these two factors into account, one has a very difficult time determining the breaking point.

But if your beam is relatively short and your material relatively brittle (aluminum nitride is very brittle), it could be a bit easier to determine. Unfortunately, you don't have enough information to determine the breaking point of the beam. You need the ultimate tensile strength. Without that, you have no way of doing this. You could look up textbook data for the material, but I wouldn't trust that to within 20%, even if you know everything about the material, so you can assume the calculation you will perform will be off by a fairly large margin.

If I were you, I'd ask the grad student why he wanted to know what load can be applied before breaking. Because that load should never be even close to being applied under normal use. If the beam is being used for something, there are allowable stresses that should never be exceeded in the material. Those allowable stresses are below yield stress by some factor of safety. So you need to find out what the yield and ultimate tensile strength is to work that out.

Just a final note, aluminum nitride is a type of ceramic. See this reference:
http://www.accuratus.com/alumni.html

If the beam is a conventional structural support, I'd be very surpised if it were made from aluminum nitride. Beams aren't generally made from that material. There are aluminum beams, but they are typically aluminum alloy of some type, not aluminum nitride. I'd suggest you verify the material before going any farther.
 
Yes it's aluminum nitride. I forgot to mention that this was for a micro switch kindda thing. They're working on nano stuff now (I really don't know what it's for...yet) but this is a part of what they're doing. The Beam will actually deflect by applying a voltage to the fixed end (don't know how that works either...yet). That's what I understood from the guy.
 
Ah - ha.. <lightbulb goes on> That makes a lot more sense now.

If someone wants an estimate of the load needed to break the beam, use the flexure strength to estimate the stress it will break at with the equation I gave above.

If someone wants to know what load can safely be applied, chose a factor of safety below that estimated load. I'd suggest a factor of safety of 3 to 5. (ie: don't exceed a load of 1/3 to 1/5 that which will break the beam) You could use a smaller value, but that should really only be done after you and the others understand what benefits you can get from increasing stress and what possible reprecussions there will be if the beam breaks.

If this beam is under a fatigue load, that's a different story altogether.

So before you go any farther, you'll need to look into material properties. I wouldn't use textbook data if you don't have to. Find out where the beam came from and see if the supplier can give you more accurate strength data.

Better yet, if you have a whole bunch of these things laying around, try breaking them and use that data!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K